|
Will miss today's call and a couple updates
FYI, I have a conflict for this morning’s SPDX implementer’s call, so I thought I would send a couple updates via email. I’ve started working on updating the SPDX java libraries to the SPDX 3.0 spec.
FYI, I have a conflict for this morning’s SPDX implementer’s call, so I thought I would send a couple updates via email. I’ve started working on updating the SPDX java libraries to the SPDX 3.0 spec.
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
|
|
SPDX documentation question
2 messages
I have a question about the PackageVerificationCode field when generating an SPDX document. The field is documented here: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/package-information/#79-package-verifica
I have a question about the PackageVerificationCode field when generating an SPDX document. The field is documented here: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/package-information/#79-package-verifica
|
By
David Prater
·
|
|
Failed to meet critical mass for a joint filing to CISA on the self-attestation form
Hello Everyone, Thanks for those that responded to the call to file a joint comment to CISA for the self-attestation call for comments, but I’m sorry to say we did not reach a critical mass (10 partic
Hello Everyone, Thanks for those that responded to the call to file a joint comment to CISA for the self-attestation call for comments, but I’m sorry to say we did not reach a critical mass (10 partic
|
By
Dick Brooks
·
|
|
An honest and objective analysis of VEX/VDR from Steve Springett
I highly recommend listening to this podcast from a genuine expert on VEX and VDR. Steve is an engineer that has implemented both VEX and VDR and is well qualified to provide an expert opinion, based
I highly recommend listening to this podcast from a genuine expert on VEX and VDR. Steve is an engineer that has implemented both VEX and VDR and is well qualified to provide an expert opinion, based
|
By
Dick Brooks
·
|
|
Implementers call tomorrow May 17th
5 messages
Hello SPDX Implementers: We have our bi-monthly call tomorrow. On the agenda for tomorrow: Proposal to open this call to tooling users as well as implementers? SPDX 3.0 RC1 Tooling Implementers progre
Hello SPDX Implementers: We have our bi-monthly call tomorrow. On the agenda for tomorrow: Proposal to open this call to tooling users as well as implementers? SPDX 3.0 RC1 Tooling Implementers progre
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
NTIA minimum elements and mapping to SPDX that I promised to send
Thanks, Dick Brooks Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.rel
Thanks, Dick Brooks Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.rel
|
By
Dick Brooks
·
|
|
SPDX Implementers call tomorrow Feb 8
Hello SPDX Implementers! Reminder that we are continuing our discussion around “What makes a quality SBOM” tomorrow at our usual meeting time (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST). We will use the regular https
Hello SPDX Implementers! Reminder that we are continuing our discussion around “What makes a quality SBOM” tomorrow at our usual meeting time (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST). We will use the regular https
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
Example Apache Tomcat SPDX - verified using online too - VALID
7 messages
Hello Everyone, During this week’s implementers call I suggested that we all try to create an SPDX SBOM from a common Apache Distribution. I’ve attached a validated, SPDX V 2.2 SBOM for the Apache Tom
Hello Everyone, During this week’s implementers call I suggested that we all try to create an SPDX SBOM from a common Apache Distribution. I’ve attached a validated, SPDX V 2.2 SBOM for the Apache Tom
|
By
Dick Brooks
·
|
|
SPDX Implementers call tomorrow Jan 25th
Hello SPDX Implementers, Reminder that we are continuing our discussion around “What makes a quality SBOM” tomorrow at our usual meeting time (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST). We will use the regular https
Hello SPDX Implementers, Reminder that we are continuing our discussion around “What makes a quality SBOM” tomorrow at our usual meeting time (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST). We will use the regular https
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
SPDX DocFest followup - what makes a quality SBOM?
2 messages
Reminder that our discussion around “What makes a quality SBOM” is happening tomorrow! I hope you can make it 😊 8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST. Use https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting to join. Note
Reminder that our discussion around “What makes a quality SBOM” is happening tomorrow! I hope you can make it 😊 8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST. Use https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting to join. Note
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
Proposal: cancel SPDX implementers meeting tomorrow
2 messages
There is a scheduled SPDX implementers call tomorrow, December 14th (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST - https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting) but due to the end of year vacations I’m not sure we will
There is a scheduled SPDX implementers call tomorrow, December 14th (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST - https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting) but due to the end of year vacations I’m not sure we will
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
[spdx-tech] Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef?
Hi Philippe, The question from Rose comes from my ticket in Tern: https://github.com/tern-tools/tern/issues/1188 It would be very good if you can help Rose to implement a better solution than the Lice
Hi Philippe, The question from Rose comes from my ticket in Tern: https://github.com/tern-tools/tern/issues/1188 It would be very good if you can help Rose to implement a better solution than the Lice
|
By
Vargenau, Marc-Etienne (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
·
|
|
Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef?
2 messages
Hi there, This is a question regarding LicenseRefs, specifically for the PackageLicenseDeclared field. Tern is a tool that can generate SPDX documents for containers. When we are collecting license in
Hi there, This is a question regarding LicenseRefs, specifically for the PackageLicenseDeclared field. Tern is a tool that can generate SPDX documents for containers. When we are collecting license in
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
Reminder: meeting tomorrow Nov 16th
2 messages
There is a scheduled SPDX implementers call tomorrow, November 16th (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST - https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting). I’ll plan to join tomorrow and host whoever shows up. Do
There is a scheduled SPDX implementers call tomorrow, November 16th (8am PST/11am EST/5pm CEST - https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting). I’ll plan to join tomorrow and host whoever shows up. Do
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
June 15th Implementers meeting minutes available for review
We didn’t cover much given the short meeting but a PR for this week’s meeting minutes is available for review: https://github.com/spdx/meetings/pull/191/files#diff-b6d198f07f2d146f3e04889b30268a504b8a
We didn’t cover much given the short meeting but a PR for this week’s meeting minutes is available for review: https://github.com/spdx/meetings/pull/191/files#diff-b6d198f07f2d146f3e04889b30268a504b8a
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
Reminder: SPDX Implementers meeting tomorrow, June 15th
The SPDX implementers meeting is tomorrow, June 15th (8am PDT/11am EDT/5pm CEST - https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting). Here’s the agenda: Approve meeting minutes from the last call. 2.3 Schem
The SPDX implementers meeting is tomorrow, June 15th (8am PDT/11am EDT/5pm CEST - https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting). Here’s the agenda: Approve meeting minutes from the last call. 2.3 Schem
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
June 1st meeting minutes available for review
Hello SPDX Implementers, Last week’s meeting minutes are available to review: https://github.com/spdx/meetings/pull/185. Please take a look and let me know if there’s anything that needs changing (you
Hello SPDX Implementers, Last week’s meeting minutes are available to review: https://github.com/spdx/meetings/pull/185. Please take a look and let me know if there’s anything that needs changing (you
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
SPDX Implementers meeting Wednesday June 1st
4 messages
Hello SPDX Implementers, The second SPDX implementers meeting is tomorrow, June 1st (8am PDT/11am EDT/5pm CEST). Here’s the agenda: Approve meeting minutes from the last call. Please add your tool to
Hello SPDX Implementers, The second SPDX implementers meeting is tomorrow, June 1st (8am PDT/11am EDT/5pm CEST). Here’s the agenda: Approve meeting minutes from the last call. Please add your tool to
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
SPDX Implementers meeting update + minutes
Hello SPDX Implementers, As discussed in the inaugural call today, the SPDX Implementers meeting will take place every other Wednesday at 8am PDT/11am EDT/5pm CEST moving forward. I have updated the c
Hello SPDX Implementers, As discussed in the inaugural call today, the SPDX Implementers meeting will take place every other Wednesday at 8am PDT/11am EDT/5pm CEST moving forward. I have updated the c
|
By
Rose Judge
·
|
|
Updated Event: SPDX Implementers Meeting
#cal-invite
SPDX Implementers Meeting When: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles Repeats: Every 2 weeks on Wednesday Where: https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting Organize
SPDX Implementers Meeting When: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles Repeats: Every 2 weeks on Wednesday Where: https://meet.jit.si/SPDXImplementersMeeting Organize
|
By
Group Notification
·
|