testing spdx-tech mailing list - cc'ing kate/peter/gary. If you're all registered, for future will primarily use the mailing list Kate: shall we meet today? Per last week's general call, will follow y

We have been meeting Tuesdays, 11AM-12 (Boston time) Here is meeting URL ­ permanent one hopefully http://blackducksoftware.na6.acrobat.com/spdxrdf/ Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and Canada): (877) 4

I got a start at doing a more detailed review of the zlib example posted last Wednesday. The namespace for spdx rdf is slightly different (trailing “/” is no longer present). I think the current examp

Some recent feed back on the composite-licensing proposal [1] was that a way is needed to for particular composite licensing info to be referenced by multiple files in the tag-value format. While atte

I move we promote <http://www.spdx.org/wiki/proposal-2010-10-21-4-composite-licensing> to an open status. This would open debate of the proposal to the full spdx group. If anyone has questions or obje

Are we meeting today?

Attached is the zlib example rdf I used with the pretty-printer development. It is based on the original zlib example on the SPDX examples area. Gary

Feel free to update the minutes if I missed anything. Also – could one of you point me to where the minutes are on the Wiki? Thanks, Gary

My action item for the week was to explore the potential ways of representing the embedded (non-standard) licenses in the rdf/xml format. I have found two possible approaches: associating the license

Greetings all, As a follow-up to our last meeting, attached is a proposal for adding a stronger association between the File and Package. Thanks to Peter for suggesting a List approach – The more I th

Bill, Can you resend the bridge and conf info? Thanks, Kate

I took the liberty of knocking together a strawman version of the spec that describes sectioning and rdf mapping mechanism for the tag-value format. This is only part of the spec. I wanted to get some

I wrote up the beginnings of a proposal for doing to tag-value to rdf mapping, <http://www.spdx.org/wiki/proposal-2010-12-07-1-tag-value-rdf-mapping>. The proposal does not include any changes to the

We now have a issue tracker for the SPDX specification and related tools. Please report any issues you are aware of with the spec or tools at <http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=sp

I posted the minutes from our call this morning to the Wiki. Feel free to make any corrections if I missed anything. Thanks, Gary

Just a reminder that the spdx-tech group meets weekly on Tuesdays at 16:00 GMT (8:00AM Pacific Time, 11:00 AM Eastern Time). Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and Canada): (877) 435-0230; International d

We have completed our transition the linux foundation's infrastructure. This final piece was having a publicly cloneable git repository for the spec. This is now in place. This should make it easier f

I am responding to the recent email threads discussing licenses for object files and "license interaction": Overall we need to remember that the mission of SPDX for the foreseeable future is be enable

I pushed the pretty printer source to the git repository. I had to wrestle a bit with the Eclipse git plugin, so let me know if you have any trouble accessing the source or if the source organization

Consider the situation where a supplier that wants to provide an library as an object file and the headers and a purchaser would like to get package and license information for that library in spdx fo