I took the liberty of knocking together a strawman version of the spec that describes sectioning and rdf mapping mechanism for the tag-value format. This is only part of the spec. I wanted to get some feed back and buy in before proceeding further. I have attached the html version of the spec.
Please let me know what you think, both of the sectioning/mapping approach and the overall arrangement of this version of the spec.
Kate, i took another pass at the vocabulary section and removed a lot of the rdf jargon.
Everyone, what do you think about the attached straw-man version of the spec ?
Peter
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> wrote:
I took the liberty of knocking together a strawman version of the spec that describes sectioning and rdf mapping mechanism for the tag-value format. This is only part of the spec. I wanted to get some feed back and buy in before proceeding further. I have attached the html version of the spec.
Please let me know what you think, both of the sectioning/mapping approach and the overall arrangement of this version of the spec.
More (minor) improvement to the strawman draft are attached. Feed back welcome.
Peter
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> wrote:
Kate, i took another pass at the vocabulary section and removed a lot of the rdf jargon.
Everyone, what do you think about the attached straw-man version of the spec ?
Peter
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> wrote:
I took the liberty of knocking together a strawman version of the spec that describes sectioning and rdf mapping mechanism for the tag-value format. This is only part of the spec. I wanted to get some feed back and buy in before proceeding further. I have attached the html version of the spec.
Please let me know what you think, both of the sectioning/mapping approach and the overall arrangement of this version of the spec.
