Date   
[SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Dick Brooks · #4872 ·
[SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Dick Brooks · #4871 ·
[SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Dick Brooks · #4870 ·
New US Government RFP from the State Department (Evolve project) requiring SBOM's By Dick Brooks · #4869 ·
[spdx-implementers] Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef? By ... · #4868 ·
[spdx] SPDX creation phase By ... · #4867 ·
Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef? By Rose Judge · #4866 ·
[spdx] SPDX creation phase By Steve Kilbane · #4865 ·
Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Philippe Ombredanne · #4864 ·
Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Tony Aiuto · #4863 ·
spdx-sbom-generator community meetings By Nisha Kumar · #4862 ·
Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Dick Brooks · #4861 ·
Another party claiming that SBOM is bad By Dick Brooks · #4860 ·
New tools-python release candidate By Nicolaus Weidner · #4859 ·
Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, November 29, 2022 By ... · #4858 ·
New date for SPDX DocFest - Nov 30th (was Re: [spdx-tech] Registration open for SPDX DocFest on Nov 11th) By Kate Stewart · #4857 ·
New date for SPDX DocFest - Nov 30th (was Re: [spdx-tech] Registration open for SPDX DocFest on Nov 11th) By Anthony Harrison · #4856 ·
Reminder: tools-python meeting 30min later this week By Nicolaus Weidner · #4855 ·
FYI: Anti-SBOM campaign from ITI By Dick Brooks · #4854 ·
An example where canonicalization does not behave well with extensions By Maximilian Huber · #4853 ·
1 - 20 of 4872