Greetings, Over at Red Hat, we've been gradually increasing our support of the use of "SPDX-License-Identifier:" in source files for various reasons. We've encountered some situations where a traditio

Hi everyone, On account of the US Thanksgiving holiday, we will not have an SPDX-legal team meeting tomorrow, Thursday, Nov 25th Have a great holiday or weekend and we'll be back on schedule in Decemb

Hi all, This is a topic that came up some time ago (I think by way of the Reuse folks) and I’ve been meaning to raise it in a separate thread. SPDX has a lot of license data by way of the SPDX License

Hello all, The version 3.15 release of the license list is now tagged and live at https://spdx.org/licenses. 4 new licenses were added to the list: COIL-1.0 Community-Spec-1.0 FDK-AAC Linux-man-pages-

Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled call tomorrow, Thursday at 10 am mountain standard time. (the US has now pushed our clocks forward, so we should be back to our normal time zone gap differences

Hey all, Since SPDX's effort to include all remaining approved Fedora licenses in SPDX has stalled out (again!)[1][2], can someone *please* add the FDK-AAC identifier to SPDX? It's blocking my submiss

Dear all, My pull request regarding the BSD-1-Clause license is up and ready to be merged (https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/pull/1350). :) I've also been looking through the LicenseListPublish

And thereby missing all of you lovely people. We’ve a big deadline this week so I need to use that hour for other things, unfortunately. --V -- VM (Vicky) Brasseur Director, Senior Strategy Advisor Op

Hi all, I came across a "variant" of the Caldera license. Here is what we have on SPDX: https://spdx.org/licenses/Caldera.html But this project - http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh.html has this licen

Hi Pierre, I am moving the general SPDX list to BCC and sending this via the SPDX legal list, as that is the right place for this question! Also not - I have approved your message and copied you here

Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled call today in a bit over an hour from now. We’ll get back to reviewing issues and prepping for the next release - as well as any updates on other on-going proje

Hi all, We have our regular call today at noon EDT. We'll catch up on any other "intros"; I think Warner was going to give an update on the SPDX work in FreeBSD (if you are ready to do so), and get or

Hi all, Just a reminder of our regularly scheduled call in a bit over an hour. The docfest is going on today as well, so we may have thinner attendance, but we’ll meet and work on looking at issues an

Hi OSI, Just noting that this does not appear to be on the SPDX License List currently. Copying SPDX-legal here as well. A new license request has been added here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list

Hi all, I wanted to raise a question I've been thinking of in light for Fedora and other open source OS distros looking to adopt use of SPDX license identifiers in various ways. One concern that has b

Hi all, Just a reminder we have our legal call tomorrow/Thursday at the usual time and place. https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting Paul and I both have a conflicts, but Steve will there. Now that we h

Hello all, The version 3.14 release of the license list is now tagged and live at https://spdx.org/licenses. 13 new licenses were added to the list: CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-FR CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-UK CC-BY-2.5-AU

Hi Anthony, Thanks for pointing this out. I tried to add a comment, but it appears to be closed. Thomas is active in the SPDX-tech team, but would be nice if someone from the SPDX-legal could add a bi

Hi SPDX-legal, I've been chatting to some of the Fedora folks about adopting the use of SPDX license identifiers in its package spec files. I just posted a comment/ proposal to a PR that was opened so