|
license/issues that need review - June 1
Hi SPDX-legal, Please help review and comment on the following license submissions. Keep in mind the license inclusion guidelines at https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/DOCS/license-inc
Hi SPDX-legal, Please help review and comment on the following license submissions. Keep in mind the license inclusion guidelines at https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/DOCS/license-inc
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
public domain dedication variants in the wild (found in Fedora)
22 messages
Hi SPDX-legal Some time ago, I raised the issue of the possibility of finding a proliferation of "public domain "dedication" texts in the course of Fedora reviewing package license info to adopt SPDX
Hi SPDX-legal Some time ago, I raised the issue of the possibility of finding a proliferation of "public domain "dedication" texts in the course of Fedora reviewing package license info to adopt SPDX
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
Next tech team meeting - discuss licensing profile
2 messages
Hello SPDX Legal and Tech teams, Next Tuesday, during the Tech team’s regularly scheduled call at noon Eastern US time, we’ll be starting out with a discussion of the SPDX 3.0 Licensing profile and so
Hello SPDX Legal and Tech teams, Next Tuesday, during the Tech team’s regularly scheduled call at noon Eastern US time, we’ll be starting out with a discussion of the SPDX 3.0 Licensing profile and so
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
[spdx-tech] GSoC '23 Proposal: SoftWare Heritage SPDX generation
2 messages
Hi Harsh, Delighted to have you working on this project! Happy to set up some time and provide some orientation about SPDX specification evolution, and starting points to work with. Can you please sen
Hi Harsh, Delighted to have you working on this project! Happy to set up some time and provide some orientation about SPDX specification evolution, and starting points to work with. Can you please sen
|
By
Kate Stewart
·
|
|
GSoC '23 Proposal: SoftWare Heritage SPDX generation
Dear SPDX community, I hope this email finds you well, My name is Harsh Vardhan Mahawar and I am delighted to have been selected as a GSoC contributor during this summer with the SPDX organization. Fi
Dear SPDX community, I hope this email finds you well, My name is Harsh Vardhan Mahawar and I am delighted to have been selected as a GSoC contributor during this summer with the SPDX organization. Fi
|
By
HarshVardhan Mahawar
·
|
|
meeting tomorrow, various updates
Hi all, Reminder we have our regular SPDX-legal meeting tomorrow at noon US eastern time at https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting As for agenda: 1) We will have Vedant Jolly - our GSoC student working
Hi all, Reminder we have our regular SPDX-legal meeting tomorrow at noon US eastern time at https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting As for agenda: 1) We will have Vedant Jolly - our GSoC student working
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
License list navigation menu item removal
5 messages
Jordi, Thanks for putting this idea out before anything is decided. I know that we need to move to get the website in shape for the 3.0 release, so this is important. I wanted to share with the Legal
Jordi, Thanks for putting this idea out before anything is decided. I know that we need to move to get the website in shape for the 3.0 release, so this is important. I wanted to share with the Legal
|
By
Phil Odence
·
|
|
New Change Proposal Filed: Expand Options for Data License in SPDX Documents #8
Happy Friday, everyone! Just filed a change proposal to request an expansion of options for the field “Data License” for SPDX documents. Please consider and add any comments/questions in the proposal!
Happy Friday, everyone! Just filed a change proposal to request an expansion of options for the field “Data License” for SPDX documents. Please consider and add any comments/questions in the proposal!
|
By
Ria Schalnat (HPE)
·
|
|
3.21 release timing
Hi all, As many of you are aware, we delayed the 3.21 release due to other priorities, particularly the 3.0 release candidate. Steve and I discussed various scheduling realities and wanted to let you
Hi all, As many of you are aware, we delayed the 3.21 release due to other priorities, particularly the 3.0 release candidate. Steve and I discussed various scheduling realities and wanted to let you
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
Request for Feedback on Proposal
4 messages
Hi everyone, I am Vedant Jolly I hope this email finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing this email to seek your valuable feedback and suggestions on a proposal that I have recently dr
Hi everyone, I am Vedant Jolly I hope this email finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing this email to seek your valuable feedback and suggestions on a proposal that I have recently dr
|
By
Vedant Jolly
·
|
|
licenses to review or comment on
2 messages
Hi all, If we could get some other eyes on the following license requests, that would be great! another Latex2e variation: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1947 - I think this is an eas
Hi all, If we could get some other eyes on the following license requests, that would be great! another Latex2e variation: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1947 - I think this is an eas
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
Reminder meeting May17th: Fedora Legal - SPDX Hackfest
2 messages
Hi SPDX-legal, As mentioned previously, the Fedora hackfest was rescheduled to this coming Wednesday, May 17th. It'd be great to have a couple more SPDX-legal folks there to, perhaps, review-live any
Hi SPDX-legal, As mentioned previously, the Fedora hackfest was rescheduled to this coming Wednesday, May 17th. It'd be great to have a couple more SPDX-legal folks there to, perhaps, review-live any
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
call now (re: 3.0 licensing profile)
Hi all, Steve sent a reminder on Monday, but in case people missed getting a more typical last minute reminder, we are meeting now! Jilayne
Hi all, Steve sent a reminder on Monday, but in case people missed getting a more typical last minute reminder, we are meeting now! Jilayne
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
SPDX 3.0 Tooling mini-summit and Licensing profile
Hello SPDX legal team list, As a heads-up, you may have seen that the initial pre-release of SPDX 3.0 (3.0-rc1) was tagged yesterday: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/releases/tag/3.0-rc1 This ini
Hello SPDX legal team list, As a heads-up, you may have seen that the initial pre-release of SPDX 3.0 (3.0-rc1) was tagged yesterday: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/releases/tag/3.0-rc1 This ini
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
Elucidating why I'm leaving SPDX
Dear all, I have relished the intellectual company of the SPDX community. There has been no other open source community that I have felt more welcomed in, nor one that shows so much potential for the
Dear all, I have relished the intellectual company of the SPDX community. There has been no other open source community that I have felt more welcomed in, nor one that shows so much potential for the
|
By
Sebastian Crane
·
|
|
New SPDX social media handles, blog and brand update
4 messages
Hi, As most of you know by now, my name is Jordi Mon and I am the newest member of the SPDX project here at the Linux Foundation. Among other things, I'm trying to provide the community with a platfor
Hi, As most of you know by now, my name is Jordi Mon and I am the newest member of the SPDX project here at the Linux Foundation. Among other things, I'm trying to provide the community with a platfor
|
By
Jordi Mon
·
|
|
Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions
4 messages
Hello spdx-legal and spdx-tech team lists, As a reminder, following from the joint teams meeting in January, there is a pending Change Proposal [1] regarding whether and how to add the ability to expr
Hello spdx-legal and spdx-tech team lists, As a reminder, following from the joint teams meeting in January, there is a pending Change Proposal [1] regarding whether and how to add the ability to expr
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs
3 messages
Hi SPDX-legal, As you all are well aware, Fedora has adopted the use of SPDX ids in its package metadata. So far, Fedora package maintainers have been updating the license info for their packages at t
Hi SPDX-legal, As you all are well aware, Fedora has adopted the use of SPDX ids in its package metadata. So far, Fedora package maintainers have been updating the license info for their packages at t
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
licenses that need review
Hi all, Especially since we have the Change Proposal to discuss on this week's call, it'd be great if we could move some license requests forward outside of a meeting :) Issues that need additional re
Hi all, Especially since we have the Change Proposal to discuss on this week's call, it'd be great if we could move some license requests forward outside of a meeting :) Issues that need additional re
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
meeting at top of hour
Hi all, We have our regular SPDX-legal meeting at the top of the hour at https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting Given we have a release due at the end of April, let's focus on decisions for pending lice
Hi all, We have our regular SPDX-legal meeting at the top of the hour at https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting Given we have a release due at the end of April, let's focus on decisions for pending lice
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|