|
list of license related issues
3 messages
Hi SPDX legal and tech teams, I was trying to get my head around any and all issues/PRs/topics that are license related. Please let me know if I've missed anything on the list below! Given the pending
Hi SPDX legal and tech teams, I was trying to get my head around any and all issues/PRs/topics that are license related. Please let me know if I've missed anything on the list below! Given the pending
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
SPDX-License-Identifiers in Snippets
3 messages
Hello spdx-legal team (cc spdx-tech team), Similar to my separate email earlier today, I'd also encourage interested folks to take a look at the draft annex in PR #464 at https://github.com/spdx/spdx-
Hello spdx-legal team (cc spdx-tech team), Similar to my separate email earlier today, I'd also encourage interested folks to take a look at the draft annex in PR #464 at https://github.com/spdx/spdx-
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
[spdx/spdx-spec] Add new annex on license namespaces (PR
2 messages
(responding via email so I can add spdx-legal mailing list; not sure what mess this will make in Github, so apologies in advance) that is my understanding too There are obvious pros and cons to both a
(responding via email so I can add spdx-legal mailing list; not sure what mess this will make in Github, so apologies in advance) that is my understanding too There are obvious pros and cons to both a
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
Sending my regrets for tomorrow's meeting
Dear all, Unfortunately, I will not be able to make tomorrow's SPDX Legal Team meeting. In fact, I will not have an internet connection for the rest of the week, but I'll be back online next week! If
Dear all, Unfortunately, I will not be able to make tomorrow's SPDX Legal Team meeting. In fact, I will not have an internet connection for the rest of the week, but I'll be back online next week! If
|
By
Sebastian Crane
·
|
|
SPDX Legal Team call Thursday, May 26
2 messages
Hi all, Our regularly-scheduled 4th Thursday meeting will be at the usual time this Thursday. There are two topics that I'd like us to discuss, as there has been active discussion on the issue threads
Hi all, Our regularly-scheduled 4th Thursday meeting will be at the usual time this Thursday. There are two topics that I'd like us to discuss, as there has been active discussion on the issue threads
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
License namespaces
2 messages
Hello spdx-legal team (cc spdx-tech team), Some of you may recall the conversations in 2019 and 2020 around the idea of adding a "license namespace" concept to the SPDX spec. This was intended to be a
Hello spdx-legal team (cc spdx-tech team), Some of you may recall the conversations in 2019 and 2020 around the idea of adding a "license namespace" concept to the SPDX spec. This was intended to be a
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
call today
Hi, We have our regularly scheduled call today at noon Eastern US time. Tech Team Lead, Gary O'Neall, will be joining us to talk about the SPDX Online Tools! https://tools.spdx.org/app/ Jilayne
Hi, We have our regularly scheduled call today at noon Eastern US time. Tech Team Lead, Gary O'Neall, will be joining us to talk about the SPDX Online Tools! https://tools.spdx.org/app/ Jilayne
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
3.17 License List release
Hello all, The version 3.17 release of the license list is now tagged and live at https://spdx.org/licenses. 5 new licenses were added to the list: Arphic-1999 Baekmuk Bitstream-Vera KiCad-libraries-e
Hello all, The version 3.17 release of the license list is now tagged and live at https://spdx.org/licenses. 5 new licenses were added to the list: Arphic-1999 Baekmuk Bitstream-Vera KiCad-libraries-e
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
versioning of license list
7 messages
Hi all, As I was adding milestones to the Github repo for the next couple releases, I wondered... do we just keep going with 3.18, 3.19, 3.20... (and 3.20 looks a lot like 3.2, but I guess that was al
Hi all, As I was adding milestones to the Github repo for the next couple releases, I wondered... do we just keep going with 3.18, 3.19, 3.20... (and 3.20 looks a lot like 3.2, but I guess that was al
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
Artistic-2.0 derivative - npm License
4 messages
Hi all, I noticed that NPM is using an Artistic-2.0 with additional terms and conditions: ----------------- npm License Copyright (c) npm, Inc. and Contributors All rights reserved. npm is released un
Hi all, I noticed that NPM is using an Artistic-2.0 with additional terms and conditions: ----------------- npm License Copyright (c) npm, Inc. and Contributors All rights reserved. npm is released un
|
By
Till Jaeger
·
|
|
legal team meeting today
Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled legal team meeting today in about an hour - at noon Eastern Daylight Savings time. We’ll focus on clearing out any tasks, issues, PRs for the 3.17 release! Jila
Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled legal team meeting today in about an hour - at noon Eastern Daylight Savings time. We’ll focus on clearing out any tasks, issues, PRs for the 3.17 release! Jila
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
SPDX Online Tools Maintence
4 messages
Just FYI – We will be doing a significant upgrade to the SPDX online tools this morning. The SPDX online tools will be offline this morning for a few minutes to a few hours depending on how the upgrad
Just FYI – We will be doing a significant upgrade to the SPDX online tools this morning. The SPDX online tools will be offline this morning for a few minutes to a few hours depending on how the upgrad
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
|
|
[spdx] - Do we need a SPDX-License-Identifier for full copyright?
3 messages
Hi Roland, I’m forwarding this to the SPDX-legal mailing list as that is the best place for this question. You also need to join that to post. I don’t have the link to that handy but if you go to the
Hi Roland, I’m forwarding this to the SPDX-legal mailing list as that is the best place for this question. You also need to join that to post. I don’t have the link to that handy but if you go to the
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
meeting in an hour
Hi all, We have our regular 4th Thursday of the month legal team meeting in just under an hour. We'll tend to the usual issues and I'm also hoping to talk a bit about updates to the Matching Guideline
Hi all, We have our regular 4th Thursday of the month legal team meeting in just under an hour. We'll tend to the usual issues and I'm also hoping to talk a bit about updates to the Matching Guideline
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
license list FAQ follow-up
Hi all, As follow-up to our discussion on the last call re: removing the license list FAQ from the webpage (https://spdx.dev/faq/) and replacing that with a link to the same in a markdown file in the
Hi all, As follow-up to our discussion on the last call re: removing the license list FAQ from the webpage (https://spdx.dev/faq/) and replacing that with a link to the same in a markdown file in the
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
License text for LGPL-3.0
11 messages
Hi all, This is a follow-up from the discussion last summer at [1], based on the conversation during the Legal Team call this past week. Folks may want to re-read the (long) thread there, which has li
Hi all, This is a follow-up from the discussion last summer at [1], based on the conversation during the Legal Team call this past week. Folks may want to re-read the (long) thread there, which has li
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
|
|
call today in about an hour
Sorry for the last minute notice. Our regular call on the 2nd Thursday of the month is today. We'll continue with our usual look at current issues and any other bigger topics as possible! Thanks, Jila
Sorry for the last minute notice. Our regular call on the 2nd Thursday of the month is today. We'll continue with our usual look at current issues and any other bigger topics as possible! Thanks, Jila
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
meeting today! (soon)
As per our new 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month schedule, we have a legal call today (in ~10') Sorry for the last minute reminder!! Jilayne
As per our new 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month schedule, we have a legal call today (in ~10') Sorry for the last minute reminder!! Jilayne
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|
|
SPDX GSoC 2022
Hi everyone! As you might have heard, the SPDX project will again this year try to participate in the Google Summer of Code initiative. For those who have not heard about it, GSoC is a “global, online
Hi everyone! As you might have heard, the SPDX project will again this year try to participate in the Google Summer of Code initiative. For those who have not heard about it, GSoC is a “global, online
|
By
Alexios Zavras
·
|
|
legal team meeting Thursday
In case anyone got confused by the subject of this email (which I've now corrected) - the meeting is indeed still on Thursdays. Not today, which would have been "tomorrow" when I sent the email on Tue
In case anyone got confused by the subject of this email (which I've now corrected) - the meeting is indeed still on Thursdays. Not today, which would have been "tomorrow" when I sent the email on Tue
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
|