Date
1 - 2 of 2
[spdx-tech] stable spec URLs
Max Mehl
~ J Lovejoy [2022-07-26 06:00 +0200]:
If I wanted to link to, for example, Annex D, in a way that would remainInteresting question! I, too, am a bit confused of the various URLs. Asked the other way round: are there also stable links for older versions, e.g. a permalink for 2.2 and its clauses/annexes once 2.3 would be released? Best, Max -- Max Mehl - Programme Manager -- Free Software Foundation Europe Contact and information: https://fsfe.org/about/mehl -- @mxmehl The FSFE is a charity that empowers users to control technology |
|
J Lovejoy
On Jul 26, 2022, at 1:41 AM, Max Mehl <max.mehl@...> wrote:Hi Max, Given the evolution of the SPDX Specification format(s) - that is, it was mainly in .pdf form for most of the past versions, I’d say that if you want to refer to a specific version, I’d use the .pdf link which may or may not have a linkable table of contents. See https://spdx.dev/specifications/ e.g., for 2.2, you can always use: https://spdx.dev/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2020/08/SPDX-specification-2-2.pdf Jilayne |
|