[spdx] - Do we need a SPDX-License-Identifier for full copyright?
Hi Roland,toggle quoted message Show quoted text
I’m forwarding this to the SPDX-legal mailing list as that is the best place for this question. You also need to join that to post. I don’t have the link to that handy but if you go to the SPDX website and the “participate” page, you will find it.
Sent from my phone, please excuse brevity and typographical errors.
On Apr 5, 2022, at 9:57 AM, spdx@... Notification <noreply@...> wrote:
Die 6. 04. 22 et hora 01:07 J Lovejoy scripsit:
To my understanding of the spec the following should indicate full copyright:Or is an empty SPDX-License-Identifier always saying that no license has
… but I can agree in practice some ambiguity can creep in, esp. when some
people scan and audit (I’m guilty of this sometimes as well) they might not
bother to apply the license ID to all files that the license applies to, but
failed to mention the license in the file itself.
Am 06.04.22 um 10:02 schrieb Matija Šuklje:
Die 6. 04. 22 et hora 01:07 J Lovejoy scripsit:What about "LicenseRef"?To my understanding of the spec the following should indicate full copyright:Or is an empty SPDX-License-Identifier always saying that no license has
Accordingly, this would be:
# SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-NoLicense
Could someone clarify what to use?
|1 - 3 of 3|