Date
1 - 2 of 2
licenses to review for submission
J Lovejoy
Hi all,
In light of our discussion on our last call about how to make it easier and faster to get licenses reviewed (and adhere to our 3 “votes” from spdx-legal members for a license to be included), I’m sending a list of license submission issues that have at least one person reviewed below - please have a look and add your thoughts!
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1706
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551
Note - not all of these used the license submission template. Relatedly, I used the new version of that on a couple and although the check boxes are an improvement, I still find it a bit clunky and slow. I am not sure if this is a biased view b/c I have so much historical knowledge, but I do think some of the factors are sort of “n/a” in some cases and you know that from the initial submission. That being said, I’m not sure I have any good ideas as to how to make it shorter or faster… yet….
Thanks!
Jilayne
In light of our discussion on our last call about how to make it easier and faster to get licenses reviewed (and adhere to our 3 “votes” from spdx-legal members for a license to be included), I’m sending a list of license submission issues that have at least one person reviewed below - please have a look and add your thoughts!
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1706
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551
Note - not all of these used the license submission template. Relatedly, I used the new version of that on a couple and although the check boxes are an improvement, I still find it a bit clunky and slow. I am not sure if this is a biased view b/c I have so much historical knowledge, but I do think some of the factors are sort of “n/a” in some cases and you know that from the initial submission. That being said, I’m not sure I have any good ideas as to how to make it shorter or faster… yet….
Thanks!
Jilayne
J Lovejoy
Hi all,
As per our license review protocol, we need 3 SPDX-legal team members to agree to add a license (not counting the submitter). Can we get more people to weigh in on these:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1608
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1652
these need 1 more person to weigh in:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551
Thanks!
Jilayne
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
As per our license review protocol, we need 3 SPDX-legal team members to agree to add a license (not counting the submitter). Can we get more people to weigh in on these:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1608
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1652
these need 1 more person to weigh in:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551
Thanks!
Jilayne
On 11/15/22 3:51 PM, J Lovejoy wrote:
Hi all, In light of our discussion on our last call about how to make it easier and faster to get licenses reviewed (and adhere to our 3 “votes” from spdx-legal members for a license to be included), I’m sending a list of license submission issues that have at least one person reviewed below - please have a look and add your thoughts! https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1706 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together) https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551 Note - not all of these used the license submission template. Relatedly, I used the new version of that on a couple and although the check boxes are an improvement, I still find it a bit clunky and slow. I am not sure if this is a biased view b/c I have so much historical knowledge, but I do think some of the factors are sort of “n/a” in some cases and you know that from the initial submission. That being said, I’m not sure I have any good ideas as to how to make it shorter or faster… yet…. Thanks! Jilayne