[spdx] Message Approval Needed - tardyp@gmail.com posted to spdx@lists.spdx.org


J Lovejoy
 

Hi Pierre,

I am moving the general SPDX list to BCC and sending this via the SPDX legal list, as that is the right place for this question! Also not - I have approved your message and copied you here so you will get the response, but you generally have to join the SPDX mailing list to post and receive message. https://lists.spdx.org/groups

Looking at the license file for that project: Alternative A is indeed MIT and Alternative B is the Unlicense (https://spdx.org/licenses/Unlicense.html)

Thus, the SPDX license expression would be:  MIT OR Unlicense

FYI - you might want to install the license diff browser plugin to help you with these kinds of things - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/spdx-license-diff/kfoadicmilbgnicoldjmccpaicejacdh?hl=en (also available for Firefox)

Thanks
Jilayne
SPDX legal team co-lead



From: "Pierre Tardy" <tardyp@...>
Subject: Public Domain license identifier
Date: October 19, 2021 at 7:12:29 AM MDT


Hello,

I am trying to identify this software in term of license expression


It's is claimed to be "public domain or MIT".
I don't see any license identifier for public domain. It is arguabily not a license, and not valid across jurisdictions, but anyway we would like to document the authors will even if we will conclude the use of MIT.

So what should we document in your opinion?

Regards

Pierre




Pierre Tardy
 

Thank you Jilayne and Richard for your kind answers.

I am so used to look at file headers that I didn't even think of looking if there was a LICENSE file :-}

Regards,
Pierre


Le mar. 19 oct. 2021 à 22:04, J Lovejoy <opensource@...> a écrit :
Hi Pierre,

I am moving the general SPDX list to BCC and sending this via the SPDX legal list, as that is the right place for this question! Also not - I have approved your message and copied you here so you will get the response, but you generally have to join the SPDX mailing list to post and receive message. https://lists.spdx.org/groups

Looking at the license file for that project: Alternative A is indeed MIT and Alternative B is the Unlicense (https://spdx.org/licenses/Unlicense.html)

Thus, the SPDX license expression would be:  MIT OR Unlicense

FYI - you might want to install the license diff browser plugin to help you with these kinds of things - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/spdx-license-diff/kfoadicmilbgnicoldjmccpaicejacdh?hl=en (also available for Firefox)

Thanks
Jilayne
SPDX legal team co-lead



From: "Pierre Tardy" <tardyp@...>
Subject: Public Domain license identifier
Date: October 19, 2021 at 7:12:29 AM MDT


Hello,

I am trying to identify this software in term of license expression


It's is claimed to be "public domain or MIT".
I don't see any license identifier for public domain. It is arguabily not a license, and not valid across jurisdictions, but anyway we would like to document the authors will even if we will conclude the use of MIT.

So what should we document in your opinion?

Regards

Pierre