Date
1 - 6 of 6
[spdx] Adding a new opendata-focus license?
J Lovejoy
Hi Bastien,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The process for requesting a new license be added to the SPDX License List is documented here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md (and happy to get your feedback on the documentation of the process!) By the way - It looks like you sent this to the general mailing list, not the legal mailing list, as this got caught up in our filter. I have released it (obviously), but you might want to make sure you are actually on the legal mailing list here: https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx-legal (and I’m replying to both lists, but bcc the general list, as we try to keep specific topics to the specific lists) Thanks! Jilayne SPDX legal team co-lead
|
|
Steve Winslow
Hi Bastien — I see also that you did submit an issue for this license, at https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/923. Glad you found the entry point and thanks for the responses to my questions in that thread =) As Jilayne noted, the CONTRIBUTING file describes the next steps. Members of the SPDX community can review and weigh in on whether the license should be added to the list. If it is, then the subsequent step would be to prepare an XML file in the license list format (and a corresponding test text file) for the license. The legal team holds calls every other Thursday — the next one will be September 19. You can feel free to join if you would like. Best, Steve On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:04 PM J Lovejoy <opensource@...> wrote:
--
Steve Winslow Director of Strategic Programs The Linux Foundation |
|
J Lovejoy
Good catch Steve! I should have looked there first before replying.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
(carry on as usual, all, don’t mind me!)
|
|
Hi Jilayne,
thanks for following up! "J Lovejoy" <opensource@...> writes: The process for requesting a new license be added to the SPDX LicenseYes, I went through this process - I'll see if I have useful feedback on the documentation, but things looked clear to me. By the way - It looks like you sent this to the general mailing list,I think I'm correctly subscribed to both mailing lists. Thanks! -- Bastien Guerry |
|
Patrice-Emmanuel SCHMITZ
A question for Bastien: The French law (CRPA - D323-2-1) states that public administrations may only use two "data" licenses for public sector information (without initiating an exception process): 1° Licence ouverte de réutilisation d'informations publiques ; 2° Open Database License (which has the SPDX identifier ODbL-1.0) Is your Etalab "Open License" corresponding to the first one? Has it a working value in both French and English? Thanks, Patrice Le ven. 6 sept. 2019 à 05:04, J Lovejoy <opensource@...> a écrit :
--
|
|
Dear Patrice-Emmanuel,
"Patrice-Emmanuel SCHMITZ via Lists.Spdx.Org" <pe.schmitz=googlemail.com@...> writes: The French law (CRPA - D323-2-1) states that public administrationsYes, this is correct, provided that "public sector information" is understood as "public sector data". For public sector source code, public agencies are allowed to use other open source licenses, as stated here (in french): https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/licences Is your Etalab "Open License" corresponding to the first one?Yes. Has it a working value in both French and English?Yes. Thanks, -- Bastien Guerry |
|