|
link to spreadsheet for exceptions list
Hi All, As per our meeting this morning, I created a new shared spreadsheet for creating the list of license exceptions as per the new license expression language discussion at Collab Summit. This wil
Hi All, As per our meeting this morning, I created a new shared spreadsheet for creating the list of license exceptions as per the new license expression language discussion at Collab Summit. This wil
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #866
·
|
|
Help converting Fedora license IDs to SPDX format
Hi Richard (x2)! Richard H - great to hear you are using the SPDX License List for identifying licenses in AppStream for a number of reasons. Your responses below are all correct in terms of understan
Hi Richard (x2)! Richard H - great to hear you are using the SPDX License List for identifying licenses in AppStream for a number of reasons. Your responses below are all correct in terms of understan
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #872
·
|
|
Fedora List review special meeting
By
J Lovejoy
· #873
·
|
|
Fedora List review special meeting
By
J Lovejoy
· #874
·
|
|
update from special Fedora list review meeting today
Hi All, Just a quick update from the special call we had today to try and make more headway on reviewing the Fedora list - it went well!! There were 5 of us and we got through about 30 licenses in an
Hi All, Just a quick update from the special call we had today to try and make more headway on reviewing the Fedora list - it went well!! There were 5 of us and we got through about 30 licenses in an
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #875
·
|
|
Fedora List review special meeting
By
J Lovejoy
· #876
·
|
|
update and agenda for meeting tomorrow
Hi All, A couple updates and the agenda for tomorrow’s call: Minutes from May 1st meeting have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-05-01 Fedora List review: we had our
Hi All, A couple updates and the agenda for tomorrow’s call: Minutes from May 1st meeting have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-05-01 Fedora List review: we had our
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #878
·
|
|
meeting minutes posted
(even if the date is wrong…) http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-05-14 Jilayne & Paul SPDX Legal Team co-leads
(even if the date is wrong…) http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-05-14 Jilayne & Paul SPDX Legal Team co-leads
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #881
·
|
|
Fedora list review special meeting
By
J Lovejoy
· #882
·
|
|
podcast talking about SPDX...
I may highly regret calling attention to this, but we did discuss SPDX on the podcast I host in my spare-time. One of my co-hosts had some interesting thoughts about how the SPDX standard could be use
I may highly regret calling attention to this, but we did discuss SPDX on the podcast I host in my spare-time. One of my co-hosts had some interesting thoughts about how the SPDX standard could be use
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #883
·
|
|
meeting reminder (on short notice)
We do have a call today (in a few minutes…)! I did not send out an agenda but we will pick up with an update on the various initiatives needed for SPDX 2.0: 1) license expression language 2) license e
We do have a call today (in a few minutes…)! I did not send out an agenda but we will pick up with an update on the various initiatives needed for SPDX 2.0: 1) license expression language 2) license e
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #888
·
|
|
meeting minutes posted
Great call today folks! Minutes are posted. We are trucking along towards 2.0!! http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-05-29 Paul and Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-leads
Great call today folks! Minutes are posted. We are trucking along towards 2.0!! http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-05-29 Paul and Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-leads
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #890
·
|
|
Possible typo in Affero licenses
Thanks Nuno, I think we have fixed this for the next version of the License List (which will be released later this summer, along with 2.0 of the spec), but this is a good reminder to check to make su
Thanks Nuno, I think we have fixed this for the next version of the License List (which will be released later this summer, along with 2.0 of the spec), but this is a good reminder to check to make su
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #898
·
|
|
meeting minutes posted
We had a short-ish meeting today and mostly discussed what still needs to be done in preparation for 2.0 http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-06-12 Mark will be sending the draft of the l
We had a short-ish meeting today and mostly discussed what still needs to be done in preparation for 2.0 http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-06-12 Mark will be sending the draft of the l
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #900
·
|
|
legal team meeting today (soon!)
Hi All, Just a quick reminder that we have a legal team meeting in about 15 minutes :) Agenda: 1) update on 2.0 generally and various legal team tasks: - license expression syntax (Mark) - license tem
Hi All, Just a quick reminder that we have a legal team meeting in about 15 minutes :) Agenda: 1) update on 2.0 generally and various legal team tasks: - license expression syntax (Mark) - license tem
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #904
·
|
|
minutes posted
Hi All, The minutes are posted from today’s call: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-06-26 big takeaway: we are shifting to focus on an interim (pre-2.0 spec) release of the SPDX Licens
Hi All, The minutes are posted from today’s call: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-06-26 big takeaway: we are shifting to focus on an interim (pre-2.0 spec) release of the SPDX Licens
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #906
·
|
|
bzip2 license
Oliver and SPDX-Legal, Just wanted to point out that we had previously accepted the bzip2 license to be included on the next version of the SPDX License List (which is now soon to be released) and in
Oliver and SPDX-Legal, Just wanted to point out that we had previously accepted the bzip2 license to be included on the next version of the SPDX License List (which is now soon to be released) and in
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #907
·
|
|
licenses under consideration page
Thanks Dennis! Having a closer look at this made me realize there are a few things that may need to be updated or otherwise given our attention (for example, we decided to add the CC v4 licenses, they
Thanks Dennis! Having a closer look at this made me realize there are a few things that may need to be updated or otherwise given our attention (for example, we decided to add the CC v4 licenses, they
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #910
·
|
|
legal call Thursday
Tomorrow, Thursday - 10am PT / 1pm ET NEW DIAL-IN INFO!!! (the invite has been updated, but included here for clarification) Conference Number: +1-857-216-2871 User PIN: 38633 International: visit the
Tomorrow, Thursday - 10am PT / 1pm ET NEW DIAL-IN INFO!!! (the invite has been updated, but included here for clarification) Conference Number: +1-857-216-2871 User PIN: 38633 International: visit the
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #912
·
|
|
question reg GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception
Oliver, Soeren, That the SPDX License List does a poor job of representing the various GPL exceptions (for the reason you cited among others) has been long known and a frequent topic of discussion. I
Oliver, Soeren, That the SPDX License List does a poor job of representing the various GPL exceptions (for the reason you cited among others) has been long known and a frequent topic of discussion. I
|
By
J Lovejoy
· #918
·
|