Minutes have been posted. http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-03-05 For those who were on the call, please review and let me know if I missed anything!! SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensourc

Hi all, Just a reminder about our call tomorrow at 10 PST / 11 MST / 1 EST NOTE: We “sprang forward” in the US, so if you are in the UK or Europe, the time is an hour earlier than usual, e.g., 5pm UK

Hi All, The issues Sam identified below have been updated and we made a few more tweaks on the call today. Thanks to all the eagle-eyes! Meeting minutes here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minu

Good catch. According to our guidelines and explanations of the various fields (http://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/license-list-overview#fields) regarding “version” “v” or nothing, we have: The word "v

Hi Sam, Hmm… great point. This has not been considered previously and did not really need to be pre-2.0 discussions because the exceptions were not separated out, etc. Our next legal call is on the da

Hi All, Let me sum this up, to make sure we are all on the same page. LGPLv3 will be on the license list - there is no question there. The question is, now that we have the exceptions listed on their

That is a really good point about the other lists, David. (good to hear from you again on this list!!) Jilayne

HI all, Thanks for the thoughts and weighing in. We will simply keep LGPL-3.0 as is, listed as a license on the SPDX License List and not as an exception. Good to have a think about it all, though! By

In light of the 2.0 official release and there already being a General meeting tomorrow/Thursday, April 2 (http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting), the Legal Team meeting is cancelled and we can al

Hi all, The meeting minutes for the last two calls have been posted: - http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-04-16 - http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-04-30 Highlights: - f

Tom read my mind - that would be so awesome!!! How might we go about doing that?? Jilayne

Hi all, Just a reminder that we have our bi-weekly SPDX Legal Team call tomorrow, Thursday, 13 May at 18:00 GMT (10:00AM PT, 11:00 MT, 12:00 CT, 1:00PM ET) Call this number: (United States): +1-857-21

http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-05-13 Please note, we are trying to schedule a joint call with the Tech team on one of their regularly scheduled Tuesday meetings (10am PST) to discus

Thanks for the input all. I would agree with Sam and Gary’s assessment. Just to clarify - the operator “AND” is defined in Appendix IV of the spec as "If required to simultaneously comply with two or

Hi All, I am canceling the Legal call today. We will reconvene on June 11th at our usual time. I also just sent out an invite for a joint Tech and Legal team call for June 16th at 9am PT to discuss th

Hi All, I’ve begun to add the exceptions to the SPDX License List in preparation for the v2.1 release at the end of the month. A few things to ponder here or discuss on the next call: Should exception

Hi Henri, While Mark is right that there is no official recommendation by the SPDX working group, there does seem to be a bit of momentum forming around the use of: SPDX-License-Identifier: <identifie

HI Mike, Thanks for the info. Regarding the other versions of OGL, could you provide links to those? As for non-software licenses and the project mentioned below, could I ask you to join an SPDX Legal

Reminder that we have a legal team call tomorrow and have lots to cover in preparation for the v2.1 release of the SPDX License List at the end of the month! As such, we will stick strictly to the bel

The meetings have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-06-11 We did not get through all of the questions on exceptions. Some of the outstanding questions may be resolvab