Date   
"Scope" of licenses to be covered by SPDX By Philippe Ombredanne · #375 ·
Follow-up on Research Items from Last SPDX Legal Meeting (9/5) By Philippe Ombredanne · #409 ·
A non-standard "permissive" license By Philippe Ombredanne · #511 ·
A non-standard "permissive" license By Philippe Ombredanne · #514 ·
Revisiting the SPDX license representation syntax By Philippe Ombredanne · #736 ·
Revisiting the SPDX license representation syntax By Philippe Ombredanne · #744 ·
Revisiting the SPDX license representation syntax By Philippe Ombredanne · #746 ·
Revisiting the SPDX license representation syntax (Package vs. Program license) By Philippe Ombredanne · #747 ·
CDDL-1.0 broken link By Philippe Ombredanne · #938 ·
question: SPDX license for "The Linux Foundation" By Philippe Ombredanne · #961 ·
New License Request: RSA-MD By Philippe Ombredanne · #1061 ·
Should LGPL-3.0 be an exception rather than a main license? By Philippe Ombredanne · #1104 ·
What's in the full text of the LGPL-3.0? [was: Re: Should LGPL-3.0 be an exception rather than a main license?] By Philippe Ombredanne · #1105 ·
call tomorrow, agenda By Philippe Ombredanne · #1134 ·
The meaning of "AND" in license expressions [was:Re: call tomorrow, agenda] By Philippe Ombredanne · #1133 ·
meeting minutes By Philippe Ombredanne · #1199 ·
license list markup (was: "meeting minutes") By Philippe Ombredanne · #1211 ·
SPDX Legal call this Thursday By Philippe Ombredanne · #1219 ·
Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? By Philippe Ombredanne · #1256 ·
Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? By Philippe Ombredanne · #1259 ·
1 - 20 of 109