Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: Introducing myself

I think it’d be useful but do wonder if our reliance on the OSD will be an appropriate guideline.

By Alan Tse · #2425 ·

Re: Introducing myself

Ditto. SPDX can be useful within the procurement/supply chain across both software and hardware.

By Dave Marr · #2424 ·

Re: Introducing myself

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:46 PM J Lovejoy <opensource@...> wrote: Of course, we’d need to make sure we have the various open source hardware licenses on the SPDX License List first - we already

By Michael Dolan · #2423 ·

Re: Introducing myself

Hi J, Andrew, Welcome to SPDX-legal! Yes, it would be great to bring the open source hardware community into the fold. I think the easiest place to start is by using SPDX license identifiers on

By J Lovejoy · #2422 ·

meeting minutes Oct 18

HI all, The meeting minutes from our last call here: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2018-10-18 A couple things to call out: Tech team - we’d really like your thoughts on the idea of

By J Lovejoy · #2421 ·

Re: Introducing myself

Nice to meet you, Andrew. Thanks for your work on Solderpad and CERN OHL. I use CERN OHL on Holoseat and have been meaning to get to know Solderpad better as Mach 30 prefers Apache style licensing

By J. Simmons · #2420 ·

Re: Introducing myself

Hi J. As someone who is heavily involved in Open Hardware licensing (I wrote the Solderpad open hardware wrapper for the Apache 2.0 license, and I’m also involved in the drafting team of the Cern

By Andrew Katz · #2419 ·

Introducing myself

Hello Spdx-legal. My name is J. Simmons (yes, I go by just the initial "J."). I found my way to Spdx-legal by way of npm and an interest in Open Source Hardware (OSHW) licensing. I am currently

By J. Simmons · #2418 ·

New License/Exception Request: The Star And Thank Author License

(Updated with the license attachment.) Full Name: The Star And Thank Author License Short Identifier: SATA URL:

By qiwihui <qwh005007@...> · #2417 ·

New License/Exception Request: The Star And Thank Author License

Full Name: The Star And Thank Author License Short Identifier: SATA URL: https://github.com/zTrix/sata-license/blob/a72e947589ac80df3a0e586f2cb3c154bb9923f0/LICENSE.txt Then license is NOT

By qwh005007@... · #2416 ·

Re: New Exception Request: GPL Cooperation Commitment 1.0

J Lovejoy wrote just now: I was on the call today as well, and as I mentioned there, I was the person who initially asked they be considered separately, but as Fontana says.... Fontana wrote: ...the

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #2415 ·

Re: New Exception Request: GPL Cooperation Commitment 1.0

Hi Richard, all, I have not had a chance to post the minutes from today’s call, but this conversation is something we touched upon in terms of planning for post-3.3 release. I agree that it would

By J Lovejoy · #2414 ·

Re: New Exception Request: GPL Cooperation Commitment 1.0

I previously wrote, referring to https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/655 On further thought, there are actually more underlying similarities than differences between these two exceptions.

By Richard Fontana · #2413 ·

meeting today, at top of the hour

Hi all, Just a quick reminder that we have our bi-weekly call today at 10am MDT (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?p1=75&p2=394 ) We will focus on a couple hanging items to wrap up

By J Lovejoy · #2412 ·

Re: New Exception Request: GPL Cooperation Commitment 1.0

I think this is a very likely situation. And to be honest, if I see some source code under e.g. GPL-2.0-only and the author¹ signed the GPLCC-1.0, I would much prefer having that expressed in a

By Matija Šuklje · #2411 ·

New Exception Request: GPL Cooperation Commitment 1.0

Heya, This is a request for addition of the GPL Cooperation Commitment version version 1.0 to the SPDX list of License Exceptions ( https://spdx.org/licenses/exceptions-index.html ) 1. Proposed Full

By Richard Fontana · #2410 ·

Re: [spdx] OGL licenses

Hi Howard, For the long name, we can go with the first option, as it’s your preference. If we later add other open government licenses, we can always add “(UK)” then - the full name is not as

By J Lovejoy · #2409 ·

Re: [spdx] Thursday SPDX General Meeting Reminder

Hi Jilayne Many thanks for your work on this. I’d be happy with the second, (or indeed any), of the options for the long identifier. My slight preference would be for the first example, but

By Howard Davies · #2408 ·

license for schema related files

Hi all, We discussed this on the Sept 20th call and recorded notes in the issue here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/683 but I wanted to post on the mailing list to make sure everyone

By J Lovejoy · #2407 ·

Re: 3.3 release update, meeting minutes

By Gary O'Neall · #2406 ·

981 - 1000 of 3405

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms