Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Hello all, the next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be today, Thursday, May 7 at 9AM PDT / noon EDT -- following the SPDX general meeting an hour earlier. This will be (for real this

By Steve Winslow · #2805 ·

Re: FW: Invalid SPDX identifier in Linux source tree

~ Kate Stewart [2020-05-07 03:37 +0200]: Same goes for GPL-2.0 and the like. That's understandable, and a reasonable workflow. Is there any schedule for the completion of the addition of

By Max Mehl · #2804 ·

Re: FW: Invalid SPDX identifier in Linux source tree

Kernel community still recognizes GPL-2.0+ as valid, although we've deprecated it. The header quoted is fine. The conventions are documented in the kernel community trees, and the intention is when

By Kate Stewart · #2803 ·

Re: FW: Invalid SPDX identifier in Linux source tree

My understanding from being on the linux-spdx mailing list is that this is intentionally tolerated for existing SPDX-License-Identifier notices because it was correct SPDX syntax under the earlier

By Richard Fontana · #2802 ·

Re: FW: Invalid SPDX identifier in Linux source tree

wrote: No. Look again: GPL-2.0+ is right at the bottom of the list under "Deprecated Licence Identifiers". James

By James Bottomley · #2801 ·

FW: Invalid SPDX identifier in Linux source tree

I just got this note from one of my developers. Is he correct? Should we or someone send a patch to Linux project? ..m

By Mark Atwood (Amazon.com) · #2800 ·

License list - 3.9 timing update and pending issues

Hello spdx-legal list, In light of the upcoming updates to the SPDX website hosting, we are pushing back the release date for the 3.9 license list by two weeks. We are now targeting the release for

By Steve Winslow · #2799 ·

Re: I know you're probably tired of talking about the Python license, but...

hello, I downloaded the 3.8.2 release from python.org and this only seems to be true for one variant of the license text that is used in the PC version of Python:

By Armijn Hemel - Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions · #2798 ·

I know you're probably tired of talking about the Python license, but...

Hi all, I'm Mary, long time lurker. I searched the wiki, the meeting minutes, and messages, but I couldn't find an answer to my question. Sorry if it is a repeat. My problem is not with the ancient

By mhardy@... · #2797 ·

Re: documentation/examples of License Ref?

Thanks, Steve and Kyle. The link to the draft is particularly helpful. I don't want to rehash the many, many discussions about which licenses should be included in the official list; suffice to say,

By Luis Villa · #2796 ·

Re: documentation/examples of License Ref?

Hi Richard, Here are some minutes from a previous review mentioning a potential long term solution for non-listed exceptions:

By Gary O'Neall · #2795 ·

Re: documentation/examples of License Ref?

Hi Richard, Thanks for this -- all good points and I agree, in the example you gave I'd represent it in the way you described. As an FYI, regarding custom exceptions (and agreed that the example you

By Steve Winslow · #2794 ·

Re: documentation/examples of License Ref?

If you have a standard license text (that maps to one of the SPDX license identifiers) coupled with some additional nonstandardized terms, which are not captured by anything in the exceptions

By Richard Fontana · #2793 ·

Re: CERN-OHL

Hello Andrew, Thanks for submitting these three for consideration. If you're available to join today, you're of course welcome, though today's discussion will be focusing on finalizing the items for

By Steve Winslow · #2792 ·

Meeting today, Apr. 23

Hello all, the next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be today, Thursday, Apr. 23 at 9AM PDT / noon EDT. The primary agenda item will be to discuss license requests currently tagged

By Steve Winslow · #2791 ·

CERN-OHL

Hi All I have submitted the three variants of V2 of the CERN-OHL using the licence submission tool, with the proposed SPDX identifiers: CERN-OHL-2.0-P CERN-OHL-2.0-W CERN-OHL-2.0-S Please let me know

By Andrew · #2790 ·

Re: documentation/examples of License Ref?

Hi Luis, hope you (and others) are staying safe and healthy as well. Echoing Kyle, "LicenseRef-" is part of the spec syntax and is defined in Appendix IV of the spec. [1] In an actual SPDX document,

By Steve Winslow · #2789 ·

Re: documentation/examples of License Ref?

Luis, `LicenseRef-*` is technically part of the license expression syntax, too. But it mostly comes up in the context of (private, shared) SPDX XML files. I'm not aware of any package managers that

By Kyle Mitchell · #2788 ·

documentation/examples of License Ref?

👋🏼 hope everyone is doing as well as they can under the circumstances. Is there any documentation for, or examples of, correct usage of License Ref? I've been looking this morning and can't

By Luis Villa · #2787 ·

Re: [spdx] Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

This would be a good time to note that folks who care about their software freedom cannot effectively participate in SPDX, and not only because the conferencing solution is proprietary software

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #2786 ·

601 - 620 of 3405

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms