Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: public domain dedication variants in the wild (found in Fedora)

Some thoughts. Public domain needs no license since there is no enforceable copyright. If these are truly public domain now, then how can a license catalog apply? If it doesn't then this catalog could

By Warner Losh · #3365 ·

public domain dedication variants in the wild (found in Fedora)

Hi SPDX-legal Some time ago, I raised the issue of the possibility of finding a proliferation of "public domain "dedication" texts in the course of Fedora reviewing package

By J Lovejoy · #3364 ·

SPDX 3.0 Tooling mini-summit and Licensing profile

Hello SPDX legal team list, As a heads-up, you may have seen that the initial pre-release of SPDX 3.0 (3.0-rc1) was tagged yesterday: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/releases/tag/3.0-rc1 This

By Steve Winslow · #3363 ·

Elucidating why I'm leaving SPDX

Dear all, I have relished the intellectual company of the SPDX community. There has been no other open source community that I have felt more welcomed in, nor one that shows so much potential for

By Sebastian Crane · #3362 ·

Re: New SPDX social media handles, blog and brand update

Thanks, Jordi, for your patience and follow up. The brand survey might take 160 seconds, but other than requiring you to think a little bit, it’s not painful. Phil From:Spdx-legal@...

By Phil Odence <phil.odence@...> · #3361 ·

Re: Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions

Hi all, I’ve added some comments to https://github.com/spdx/change-proposal/issues/4 and am looking forward to coming to a conclusion on our first official use of the Change Proposal process at

By J Lovejoy · #3360 ·

Re: New SPDX social media handles, blog and brand update

Hi, Kind reminder to provide your feedback on what the new SPDX brand should look like. I know some questions may sound a bit odd or ethereal, but they do help the design team come up with logos that

By Jordi Mon Companys <jmon@...> · #3359 ·

Re: Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

Hi all, We/Fedora have rescheduled the ELN Hackfest for Wednesday, May 17th. Same time and meeting info as below. I'll send a reminder a few days out.

By J Lovejoy · #3358 ·

licenses that need review

Hi all, Especially since we have the Change Proposal to discuss on this week's call, it'd be great if we could move some license requests forward outside of a meeting :)

By J Lovejoy · #3357 ·

Re: Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions

Hi all, since we are discussing [2] I would like to keep another change proposal not too secret. In [6] I’ve written up a slightly more extensive change proposal that would also cover [2]. In

By Karsten Klein · #3356 ·

Re: Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions

Hello SPDX legal and tech teams, This Thursday, April 27th at 12:00 EDT, during our regularly scheduled legal team meeting [1], we will be discussing and finalizing on the details of the change

By Steve Winslow · #3355 ·

Re: New SPDX social media handles, blog and brand update

YouTube channel. Please subscribe.

By Jordi Mon <jmon@...> · #3354 ·

New SPDX social media handles, blog and brand update

Hi, As most of you know by now, my name is Jordi Mon and I am the newest member of the SPDX project here at the Linux Foundation. Among other things, I'm trying to provide the community with a

By Jordi Mon <jmon@...> · #3353 ·

Re: Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

Time corrections from the original announcement: 14:00 - 18:00 UTC 10:00 - 14:00 EDT 16:00 - 20:00 CEST On 4/17/23 10:51 AM, J Lovejoy wrote:

By J Lovejoy · #3352 ·

Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

Hi SPDX-legal, As you all are well aware, Fedora has adopted the use of SPDX ids in its package metadata. So far, Fedora package maintainers have been updating the license info

By J Lovejoy · #3351 ·

meeting at top of hour

Hi all, We have our regular SPDX-legal meeting at the top of the hour at https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting Given we have a release due at the end of April, let's

By J Lovejoy · #3350 ·

licenses to review

Hi SPDX-legal, Here are a few issues for licenses that could use another reviewer or two - please have a look so we can log decisions on these! Widget -

By J Lovejoy · #3349 ·

Spam emails targeting SPDX Legal Team members

Dear all, Today I noticed that I had received what appeared to be a spam/scam email from a 'saber chibani23 at gmail dot com'. The 'To' field contained the email addresses of a number of SPDX Legal

By Sebastian Crane · #3348 ·

Re: GSOC 2023

For a bit of background for the rest of SPDX-legal: As you know we have project submitted for GSoC, and proposals are due next week! Banula has created a proposal and is looking for

By J Lovejoy · #3347 ·

Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions

Hello spdx-legal and spdx-tech team lists, As a reminder, following from the joint teams meeting in January, there is a pending Change Proposal [1] regarding whether and how to add the ability to

By Steve Winslow · #3346 ·

41 - 60 of 3405

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms