Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: SPDX & The Licensing IG (California)

JiLayne, Could you coordinate with Tom and Mark about your active participation, please? I'd love to include you and your perspective, especially since you are co-lead and that is only fair. We can

By JC Roberts III · #925 ·

Re: SPDX & The Licensing IG (California)

Thanks to Tom and Mark for volunteering. And thanks James for reaching out. You have certainly not violated any "rules" of the mailing list- this is a workgroup organized in the open source spirit! I

By J Lovejoy · #924 ·

SPDX & The Licensing IG (California)

Thank you, Tom, for jumping in! I just now received an email from Mark Gisi offering his participation so, Mark, that would be great. Tom can start and then I can turn to you (or you can interject)

By JC Roberts III · #923 ·

Re: Agenda for Thursday SPDX legal call

Dear all – I spoke to James and will join the Licensing Interest Group’s call tomorrow. * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas H. Vidal, Esq. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP 5900 Wilshire

By Tom Vidal <TVidal@...> · #922 ·

Agenda for Thursday SPDX legal call

I just sent the odd email below and neglected to indicate that it is the State Bar of California. James James C. Roberts III Global Capital Law Group California | Colorado | Milan (assoc) Global

By JC Roberts III · #921 ·

Re: Agenda for Thursday SPDX legal call

I apologize for the "clunky" way in contacting all of you but I am not sure to whom this email should be addressed. I am James C. Roberts and the Chair of the Licensing Interest Group of the IP

By JC Roberts III · #920 ·

question regarding the information porvided in the SPDX license list

Hi Team, I checked the license list because I was searching for the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or any later version. I did not find an entry GFDL-1.3+, due to that I checked the information

By Oliver Fendt · #919 ·

Re: question reg GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception

Oliver, Soeren, That the SPDX License List does a poor job of representing the various GPL exceptions (for the reason you cited among others) has been long known and a frequent topic of discussion.

By J Lovejoy · #918 ·

new license request

Hi all, The GPL-2.0+-with-autoconf-exception is not available in the SPDX license list and I did not find it in the list “licenses under consideration”, due to this I want to request that it

By Oliver Fendt · #917 ·

Re: question reg GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception

Hi Oliver Yes clear now. (I knew I must have overlooked something, since I know that you know how to declare dual license ;)) So I agree,GPL-*.0+-with-autoconf-exception is simply not on the

By Soeren_Rabenstein@... · #916 ·

Re: question reg GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception

Hi Soeren, I was not precise, I meant that usually you find in OSS packages files which contain the following license information: # This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or

By Oliver Fendt · #915 ·

Re: question reg GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception

Dear Oliver If I understand your question right, then the answer is: you declare a dual-license in this case. Technically speaking something along the lines of

By Soeren_Rabenstein@... · #914 ·

question reg GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception

Hi Team, I have a question regarding the licenses GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception and GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception listed in the SPDX license list. Usually files are licensed under GPL-2.0+ with

By Oliver Fendt · #913 ·

legal call Thursday

Tomorrow, Thursday - 10am PT / 1pm ET NEW DIAL-IN INFO!!! (the invite has been updated, but included here for clarification) Conference Number: +1-857-216-2871 User PIN: 38633 International:

By J Lovejoy · #912 ·

Re: licenses under consideration page

Hi Legal Team, Creative Commons 4.0 License Family details added to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration plus I did a bit more re-sorting of the various

By Dennis Clark · #911 ·

licenses under consideration page

Thanks Dennis! Having a closer look at this made me realize there are a few things that may need to be updated or otherwise given our attention (for example, we decided to add the CC v4 licenses, they

By J Lovejoy · #910 ·

Re: minutes posted

Hi Legal Team, http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration is updated with new columns "Short Identifier" and "Template Needed", and I changed the name of the

By Dennis Clark · #909 ·

Re: bzip2 license

Hi Jilayne, hi team thank you for the information and the decision to include both of them. If I messed up the different versions I apologize for that. I thought it was consistent what I submitted.

By Oliver Fendt · #908 ·

bzip2 license

Oliver and SPDX-Legal, Just wanted to point out that we had previously accepted the bzip2 license to be included on the next version of the SPDX License List (which is now soon to be released) and in

By J Lovejoy · #907 ·

minutes posted

Hi All, The minutes are posted from today’s call: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-06-26 big takeaway: we are shifting to focus on an interim (pre-2.0 spec) release of the SPDX

By J Lovejoy · #906 ·

2481 - 2500 of 3405

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms