|
Re: legal call - meeting minutes & next call
corrected link for meeting minutes is: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-10-15
(and reinstated minutes for Sept 17)
J.
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
corrected link for meeting minutes is: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-10-15
(and reinstated minutes for Sept 17)
J.
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1228
·
|
|
New License/Exception Request
Full name: GNU All Permissive License
Short Identifier: GAPL
OSI-Approved: no
URL:
Full name: GNU All Permissive License
Short Identifier: GAPL
OSI-Approved: no
URL:
|
By
Didier Verna <didier@...>
·
#1240
·
|
|
check this out...
Here’s a little something to bring a smile to your face on a Friday:
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6867
:)
Jilayne
Here’s a little something to bring a smile to your face on a Friday:
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6867
:)
Jilayne
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1227
·
|
|
legal call - meeting minutes & next call
HI All,
Meeting minutes have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-09-17
Please note, our next call will be a joint call with members from the tech team to further
HI All,
Meeting minutes have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-09-17
Please note, our next call will be a joint call with members from the tech team to further
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1226
·
|
|
New License/Exception Request
Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Open Game License v1.0
Provide a proposed Short
Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Open Game License v1.0
Provide a proposed Short
|
By
Rob Conley <robertsconley@...>
·
#1239
·
|
|
legal call Thursday
Hi All,
We have a legal call tomorrow and will resume discussions on whether improvement to the license templates are warranted. I have moved the various feedback sent via email to this page:
Hi All,
We have a legal call tomorrow and will resume discussions on whether improvement to the license templates are warranted. I have moved the various feedback sent via email to this page:
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1225
·
|
|
Request New License and Exception: Open Cascade Technology Public Licese and Open Cascade Exception
Hi SPDX Legal Team,
I’ve recently run across the Open Cascade project:
http://www.opencascade.com/content/open-source-development
http://dev.opencascade.org/
For versions <= 6.6.0, they
Hi SPDX Legal Team,
I’ve recently run across the Open Cascade project:
http://www.opencascade.com/content/open-source-development
http://dev.opencascade.org/
For versions <= 6.6.0, they
|
By
Eric Weddington <Eric_Weddington@...>
·
#1238
·
|
|
no legal call this week - v2.2 is now live!
Hi All,
On account of version 2.2 of the SPDX License List being live and LinuxCon Europe being a few days away, we’ll skip this week’s call and resume on Oct 15th with a recap of LinuxCon and
Hi All,
On account of version 2.2 of the SPDX License List being live and LinuxCon Europe being a few days away, we’ll skip this week’s call and resume on Oct 15th with a recap of LinuxCon and
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1224
·
|
|
meeting minutes
The meeting minutes from today’s call are posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-09-17
Thanks,
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
The meeting minutes from today’s call are posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-09-17
Thanks,
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1223
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday
Hi Nuno, Gary, Philippe, and Sam,
This is really great information. We did not have time to discuss on the call today, as the focus was on items for the v2.2 release of the license list, but I’d
Hi Nuno, Gary, Philippe, and Sam,
This is really great information. We did not have time to discuss on the call today, as the focus was on items for the v2.2 release of the license list, but I’d
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1222
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday
Hi Sam,
Thanks for sharing your own feedback on license templatization / regexes.
Here's mine.
a) have you used the existing markup for matching purposes?
No.
Hi Sam,
Thanks for sharing your own feedback on license templatization / regexes.
Here's mine.
a) have you used the existing markup for matching purposes?
No.
|
By
Bill Schineller <bschineller@...>
·
#1221
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday
Didn't use the markup. At the time haven't found documented the pattern keywords to find inside each license term. For example, one can find [xxxx]-[xxxx], [Owner Organization], <AUTHOR>. However,
Didn't use the markup. At the time haven't found documented the pattern keywords to find inside each license term. For example, one can find [xxxx]-[xxxx], [Owner Organization], <AUTHOR>. However,
|
By
Nuno Brito
·
#1220
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday
Hi Sam,
Responses inline below:
Gary
Hi Sam,
Responses inline below:
Gary
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#1218
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday
Yes and No: ScanCode uses an SPDX-inspired/derived markup, but
instead of reusing the markup directly from the main license texts,
markup is transformed in a simpler {{mustache-like}} syntax added
Yes and No: ScanCode uses an SPDX-inspired/derived markup, but
instead of reusing the markup directly from the main license texts,
markup is transformed in a simpler {{mustache-like}} syntax added
|
By
Philippe Ombredanne
·
#1219
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday
3) License matching templates/markup:
We have a task to add markup to some of the standard headers and have also had input to add/edit markup on existing licenses. As a result of the latter, it has
3) License matching templates/markup:
We have a task to add markup to some of the standard headers and have also had input to add/edit markup on existing licenses. As a result of the latter, it has
|
By
Sam Ellis
·
#1217
·
|
|
SPDX Legal call this Thursday
Hi All,
In preparation for Thursday’s call, please review the following items in advance for our agenda.
Announcements and updates (#1) are here only for your information (nothing to discuss on
Hi All,
In preparation for Thursday’s call, please review the following items in advance for our agenda.
Announcements and updates (#1) are here only for your information (nothing to discuss on
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1216
·
|
|
no legal call today
Hi All,
Sorry for the last minute notice, but I have some pressing things to deal with. We’ll resume as usual on Sept 17th at the usual time and number.
Thanks,
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team
Hi All,
Sorry for the last minute notice, but I have some pressing things to deal with. We’ll resume as usual on Sept 17th at the usual time and number.
Thanks,
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1215
·
|
|
Re: [SPAM] RE: meeting minutes
Point for point..
Retaining the original text explicitly is not mutually exclusive with maintaining it in a single file, however it is not the approach I favor anyway (for reasons of content
Point for point..
Retaining the original text explicitly is not mutually exclusive with maintaining it in a single file, however it is not the approach I favor anyway (for reasons of content
|
By
Kris.re <Kris.re@...>
·
#1214
·
|
|
Re: meeting minutes
Hi Kris,
Both good points. Responses inline below.
Hi Kris,
Both good points. Responses inline below.
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#1213
·
|
|
Re: meeting minutes
Two things:
1) The easiest and least complex way to retain the original text is to retain the original text explicitly.
2) The existence of a single tool written in a single language is much less
Two things:
1) The easiest and least complex way to retain the original text is to retain the original text explicitly.
2) The existence of a single tool written in a single language is much less
|
By
Kris.re <Kris.re@...>
·
#1212
·
|