Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Zimbra license

Hi All, It’s come to my attention that we have another license “version” issue… Zimbra 1.3 is on SPDX list - http://spdx.org/licenses/Zimbra-1.3 This license uses “VMWare” throughout and

By J Lovejoy · #966 ·

meeting minutes (for last 2 meetings)

… have now been posted: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-09-04 and http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-09-18 Our next call is Thursday, October 2 at 11am Mtn Time.

By J Lovejoy · #965 ·

Introduction: SPDX Report Library

I would like to announce the availability of the SPDX Report Library. The objective of this program is to create a repository of articles to capture and share community knowledge about anything and

By Mark Gisi · #964 ·

SPDX X-Ray

Hi, I would like to announce the availability of X-Ray, Wind River’s latest free SPDX reporting service available at spdx.windriver.com. X-Ray delivers SPDX data in a very human friendly

By Sameer Ahmed · #963 ·

Re: question: SPDX license for "The Linux Foundation"

(exactly my point!) But I assume that I (I am NOT the copyright holder) cannot simply drop the existing wording and state that it is "BSD-3-Clause"; correct? So it would be great if a new item WAS

By Steve Rae <srae@...> · #962 ·

Re: question: SPDX license for "The Linux Foundation"

The only material difference with BSD-3-Clause seems to be in the disclaimer : [...] FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT ARE DISCLAIMED [...] where "AND NON-INFRINGEMENT" is

By Philippe Ombredanne · #961 ·

question: SPDX license for "The Linux Foundation"

By Steve Rae <srae@...> · #960 ·

reminder for call today

Hi All, A quick reminder that we have a legal team call today. We’ll have an update from LinuxCon and discuss Mark’s latest draft of the license expression syntax. (I have another call prior,

By J Lovejoy · #959 ·

Re: SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

Thank you Gary. We can discuss the + operator feedback at the next legal working group meeting. - Mark

By Mark Gisi · #958 ·

Re: SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

Hi Mark, Thanks for working on this! I finally got some time to go through your document in detail. Overall, looks good. I only had 2 comments: - The example in section III 1) has an

By Gary O'Neall · #957 ·

Re: SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

Ok, thanks. That is good to know, glad that either forms can be used. With kind regards, Nuno Brito -- http://triplecheck.de phone: +49 615 146 03187

By Nuno Brito · #956 ·

Re: SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

FWIW, Gary and I were chatting at Linuxcon and he mentioned that his tools and libraries are case insensitive. The 1.2 specification appears to use lowercase "and" and "or" in the description of

By Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...> · #955 ·

Re: SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

Hi Bruno, Thank you for the feedback. We never did discuss whether the syntax should be case sensitive or not. We will include that in our discussions. Best, Mark

By Mark Gisi · #954 ·

Re: SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

Hi Mark, all, I find the syntax examples very straightforward and useful. On some cases is used "and" (example #9) and in others is used "AND", I assume that "AND" is the desired format or can both

By Nuno Brito · #953 ·

reminder: no meeting tomorrow

Hi All, Just a reminder that we will not have our regularly scheduled call tomorrow, Thursday, 21 August due to a bunch of us being at LinuxCon North America this week. We will be back to our

By J Lovejoy · #952 ·

SPDX 2.0 Spec draft: Seeking community feedback for the License Expression Syntax section

Attached is the draft of the SPDX Legal Working group’s License Expression Syntax for the upcoming SPDX 2.0 Specification. We are seeking community feedback by September 12th. Overview: Often a

By Mark Gisi · #951 ·

Re: SPDX License List v1.20 is now LIVE!!

Amazing. I know how much work this takes. Tom Tom Incorvia;tom.incorvia@...;O: (512) 340-1336; M: (215) 500 8838; Shoretel (Internal): X27015

By Tom Incorvia · #950 ·

Re: SPDX License List v1.20 is now LIVE!!

NICE WORK! * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas H. Vidal, Esq. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP 5900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2250 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Direct Dial: 310.300.2950 |

By Tom Vidal <TVidal@...> · #949 ·

Re: SPDX License List v1.20 is now LIVE!!

You should be thrilled. And we should all be thankful for the great work of Jilayne, Paul and the Legal Team. Huge Kudos! From: Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@...> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:46:44

By Philip Odence · #948 ·

SPDX License List v1.20 is now LIVE!!

On behalf of the SPDX Legal Team, I’m thrilled to announce that SPDX License List v1.20 is now live. You can find the updated web pages in the usual spot, http://spdx.org/licenses/, which also

By J Lovejoy · #947 ·

2441 - 2460 of 3406

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms