|
SPDX License List v1.20 is now LIVE!!
On behalf of the SPDX Legal Team, I’m thrilled to announce that SPDX License List v1.20 is now live. You can find the updated web pages in the usual spot, http://spdx.org/licenses/, which also
On behalf of the SPDX Legal Team, I’m thrilled to announce that SPDX License List v1.20 is now live. You can find the updated web pages in the usual spot, http://spdx.org/licenses/, which also
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#947
·
|
|
Re: question regarding the information to be provided in case of files containing a license text
Hi Jilayne,
This is excellent. Right now I'm working in other topics but I'm looking forward to add these new items. Will report back in case some typo is found.
In the meanwhile, looking on the
Hi Jilayne,
This is excellent. Right now I'm working in other topics but I'm looking forward to add these new items. Will report back in case some typo is found.
In the meanwhile, looking on the
|
By
Nuno Brito
·
#946
·
|
|
Re: question regarding the information to be provided in case of files containing a license text
We discussed the issue raised here on the call today, so I’ll refer others who are interested in this topic to the meeting minutes, which have been posted here:
We discussed the issue raised here on the call today, so I’ll refer others who are interested in this topic to the meeting minutes, which have been posted here:
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#945
·
|
|
call today
at 11:00 Mtn Time (10am PT / 1pm ET)
Dial-in info:
Call this number: (United States): +1-857-216-2871 User PIN: 38633 International: visit the URL at http://uberconference.com/SPDXTeam
AGENDA:
1)
at 11:00 Mtn Time (10am PT / 1pm ET)
Dial-in info:
Call this number: (United States): +1-857-216-2871 User PIN: 38633 International: visit the URL at http://uberconference.com/SPDXTeam
AGENDA:
1)
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#944
·
|
|
Additions /Clarifications to GPL and other licenses
Hi Team,
sorry for another question regarding SPDX and its mapping to the world.
From time to time you find additional statements from the copyright holders regarding their view about the scope
Hi Team,
sorry for another question regarding SPDX and its mapping to the world.
From time to time you find additional statements from the copyright holders regarding their view about the scope
|
By
Oliver Fendt
·
#943
·
|
|
SugarCRM license
Hi All,
In preparing the SPDX License List v1.20 for release, I noticed an oddity with the SugarCRM License, v1.1.3 http://spdx.org/licenses/SugarCRM-1.1.3
The license text here,
Hi All,
In preparing the SPDX License List v1.20 for release, I noticed an oddity with the SugarCRM License, v1.1.3 http://spdx.org/licenses/SugarCRM-1.1.3
The license text here,
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#942
·
|
|
Re: question regarding the information to be provided in case of files containing a license text
Hi Jilayne,
sorry for answering so late.
I’ll try to be more precise.
I have attached the COPYING file of my tar scenario. The file contains for sure the text of the GPL-3.0. But it is _not_
Hi Jilayne,
sorry for answering so late.
I’ll try to be more precise.
I have attached the COPYING file of my tar scenario. The file contains for sure the text of the GPL-3.0. But it is _not_
|
By
Oliver Fendt
·
#941
·
|
|
Re: CDDL-1.0 broken link
And, by the way, this is some of the value of the SPDX license list. When
other URLs change or go away, you can still find the license at the
permanent SPDX URL.
Phil
L. Philip Odence
Vice President
And, by the way, this is some of the value of the SPDX license list. When
other URLs change or go away, you can still find the license at the
permanent SPDX URL.
Phil
L. Philip Odence
Vice President
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#940
·
|
|
Re: CDDL-1.0 broken link
Hi Vlada,
The SPDX-Legal team mailing list would be the exact proper place to report anything having to do with the SPDX License List, but this will do too!
The links in the url/source field on the
Hi Vlada,
The SPDX-Legal team mailing list would be the exact proper place to report anything having to do with the SPDX License List, but this will do too!
The links in the url/source field on the
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#939
·
|
|
Re: CDDL-1.0 broken link
Howdy:!
I am replying on the legal list that would be the right place ...
Thank you and good point ... this is the original URL, but ever since
Oracle bumped it to 1.1 it has disappeared... as many
Howdy:!
I am replying on the legal list that would be the right place ...
Thank you and good point ... this is the original URL, but ever since
Oracle bumped it to 1.1 it has disappeared... as many
|
By
Philippe Ombredanne
·
#938
·
|
|
Re: question regarding the information to be provided in case of files containing a license text
Hi Oliver,
If I understand the scenario you describe below (which I’d agree is quite common), which is: you have a COPYING.txt file at the top-level directory that contains the full text of a
Hi Oliver,
If I understand the scenario you describe below (which I’d agree is quite common), which is: you have a COPYING.txt file at the top-level directory that contains the full text of a
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#937
·
|
|
question regarding the information to be provided in case of files containing a license text
Hi all,
sorry for the cryptic subject, but perhaps you can help me.
When doing package analysis with FOSSology or other tools we often find files which contain a license text (e.g. usually the
Hi all,
sorry for the cryptic subject, but perhaps you can help me.
When doing package analysis with FOSSology or other tools we often find files which contain a license text (e.g. usually the
|
By
Oliver Fendt
·
#936
·
|
|
Re: meeting minutes from today posted
Thanks, Jilayne. Quick correction: It is Roberts (with an s).
In any event, most of you have probably seen my exchanges in recent weeks regarding the Licensing Interest Group of the IP Section of
Thanks, Jilayne. Quick correction: It is Roberts (with an s).
In any event, most of you have probably seen my exchanges in recent weeks regarding the Licensing Interest Group of the IP Section of
|
By
JC Roberts III
·
#935
·
|
|
meeting minutes from today posted
It was a small, but effective group today :)
And Welcome to newcomer, James Robert.
http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-07-24
Cheers,
Jilayne Lovejoy and Paul Madick
SPDX Legal Team
It was a small, but effective group today :)
And Welcome to newcomer, James Robert.
http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-07-24
Cheers,
Jilayne Lovejoy and Paul Madick
SPDX Legal Team
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#934
·
|
|
Re: question regarding the information porvided in the SPDX license list
Thanks for catching this, Oliver. I have now fixed the standard headers for all the GNU licenses for the upcoming release of the SPDX License List. Not sure how this got messed up, as I clearly
Thanks for catching this, Oliver. I have now fixed the standard headers for all the GNU licenses for the upcoming release of the SPDX License List. Not sure how this got messed up, as I clearly
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#933
·
|
|
meeting today (and minutes from last time)
Hi All,
The meeting minutes from the last call have been posted: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-07-10
Agenda for today (call in 15’)
1) The next release of the license list is
Hi All,
The meeting minutes from the last call have been posted: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-07-10
Agenda for today (call in 15’)
1) The next release of the license list is
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#932
·
|
|
Re: Possible typo in Affero licenses
Thank you for the consideration.
With kind regards,
Nuno Brito
---
http://triplecheck.de
phone: +49 615 146 03187
Thank you for the consideration.
With kind regards,
Nuno Brito
---
http://triplecheck.de
phone: +49 615 146 03187
|
By
Nuno Brito
·
#931
·
|
|
Re: Possible typo in Affero licenses
Fixed with proper link for v1.20 (next release)
thanks!
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
Fixed with proper link for v1.20 (next release)
thanks!
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#930
·
|
|
Re: SPDX presentation during Licensing IG conference call
Jason,
Thanks for your offer. We would love to have you participate both with the Licensing IG and the IP Section, whether SPDX, supply chain issues or other licensing matters. In the IG we have a
Jason,
Thanks for your offer. We would love to have you participate both with the Licensing IG and the IP Section, whether SPDX, supply chain issues or other licensing matters. In the IG we have a
|
By
JC Roberts III
·
#929
·
|
|
Re: SPDX presentation during Licensing IG conference call
Just seeing this thread, I would also be happy to participate in any future sessions with the IP Section of the CA Bar, especially if there's interest around a broad industry-side view on the critical
Just seeing this thread, I would also be happy to participate in any future sessions with the IP Section of the CA Bar, especially if there's interest around a broad industry-side view on the critical
|
By
Jason Buttura
·
#928
·
|