Hi Maciej, As per discussion on the SPDX Legal Call today, this license will be added to the next version of the SPDX License List. Thanks for your request! Cheers, Jilayne SPDX Legal Team

Apologies to all that I am missing today's meeting. But in my stead, I'm sending you this discovery. My 2.5 year-old son is obsessed with seeing pictures and watching videos of 'pace (for those of you

Hi SPDX Legal, On a previous legal team call I offered to look into differences between thePython License 2.0 (Python-2.0) and theJython licenses. Note that Jython was originally called JPython.

Agenda for Thursday’s call: 1) SPDX 2.0 - last meeting (see link below to minutes) the legal team identified priorities that need to be completed for version 2.0 of the spec. Now we need to sort

Apologies for my absence from the call today. I had a board meeting. Hope it went well. * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas H. Vidal, Esq. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP 5900 Wilshire

Regarding the review of Fedora's "good licenses" for inclusion in the SPDX List (agenda Item #2),. See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmVnI0dGKEo1dENVVHFNeG5hQjAyYjQ3bm1VVUdjOFE#gid=1

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmVnI0dGKEo1dENVVHFNeG5hQjAyYjQ3bm1VVUdjOFE#gid=1

Call Thursday at 1pm ET Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio 1) Update license expression discussions

Thanks for your interest, Daniel, and thanks, Mark for your detailed response to Daniel’s questions. I’ve added few bits below for further clarification in regards to other (not GNU) licenses

Hi Daniel, The ‘+’ operator is used to represent the case we see so often: You may choose to use version <N> of license <L> or any later version of license <L>. The intent is to

A comment about the "+" operator. The standard SPDX Licenst list on the Appendix 1 of the 1.2 Specification, contains entries without the version qualification. Adaptive Public License

Editor’s note: Big thanks to Mark Gisi for driving this important effort. *** In the wake of ahighly productive cross-functional meeting at the Linux Collaboration Summit, the SPDX Legal Team

SPDX License List request added, with comments, to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration Please refer to

Regarding the review of Fedora's "good licenses" for inclusion in the SPDX List (agenda Item #2), the shared document online has been updated with our discussions and decisions from today. See:

Call today at 1pm ET Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio 1) Update regarding discussions at LF Collaboration

New License Request, with Tom's comments, added to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration Regards, Dennis Clark nexB

Hello Maciej and SPDX, Due primarily to the licensing information stated prior to the slightly modified BSD-4-Clause, I would recommend that this be reviewed by SPDX as a license distinct from the

Dear Ladies and Gentleman, I'm not sure weather this should be considered BSD 4-Clause, so I've decided to submit request. Full Name of License: BSD 4-clause Caldera License License Identifier (aka

The meeting minutes from this week have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-03-20 Most notably, the Collab Summit agenda has been updated with a description:

Hi All, I'll be driving from San Jose to Napa Tuesday evening (flexible on departure time) and from Napa directly to SFO on Friday evening. If anyone wants to catch a ride in either direction, email