Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Hi All, As per our meeting this morning, I created a new shared spreadsheet for creating the list of license exceptions as per the new license expression language discussion at Collab Summit. This

By J Lovejoy · #865 ·

Re: New License Request

Hi Maciej, As per discussion on the SPDX Legal Call today, this license will be added to the next version of the SPDX License List. Thanks for your request! Cheers, Jilayne SPDX Legal Team

By J Lovejoy · #864 ·

Missing the meeting

Apologies to all that I am missing today's meeting. But in my stead, I'm sending you this discovery. My 2.5 year-old son is obsessed with seeing pictures and watching videos of 'pace (for those of you

By Thomas H. Vidal <thomashvidal@...> · #867 ·

Jython and Python License Differences

Hi SPDX Legal, On a previous legal team call I offered to look into differences between thePython License 2.0 (Python-2.0) and theJython licenses. Note that Jython was originally called JPython.

By Tom Incorvia · #863 ·

agenda for May 1 call

Agenda for Thursday’s call: 1) SPDX 2.0 - last meeting (see link below to minutes) the legal team identified priorities that need to be completed for version 2.0 of the spec. Now we need to sort

By J Lovejoy · #862 ·

Re: SPDX legal call

Apologies for my absence from the call today. I had a board meeting. Hope it went well. * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas H. Vidal, Esq. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP 5900 Wilshire

By Tom Vidal <TVidal@...> · #861 ·

SPDX legal call

Regarding the review of Fedora's "good licenses" for inclusion in the SPDX List (agenda Item #2),. See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmVnI0dGKEo1dENVVHFNeG5hQjAyYjQ3bm1VVUdjOFE#gid=1

By Madick, Paul <paul.madick@...> · #860 ·

Re: Agenda for Thursday SPDX legal call

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmVnI0dGKEo1dENVVHFNeG5hQjAyYjQ3bm1VVUdjOFE#gid=1

By Zak White <ztw.white@...> · #859 ·

Agenda for Thursday SPDX legal call

Call Thursday at 1pm ET Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio 1) Update license expression discussions

By Madick, Paul <paul.madick@...> · #858 ·

Re: Proposed Update to SPDX License Expression Language

Thanks for your interest, Daniel, and thanks, Mark for your detailed response to Daniel’s questions. I’ve added few bits below for further clarification in regards to other (not GNU) licenses

By J Lovejoy · #857 ·

Re: Proposed Update to SPDX License Expression Language

Hi Daniel, The ‘+’ operator is used to represent the case we see so often: You may choose to use version <N> of license <L> or any later version of license <L>. The intent is to

By Mark Gisi · #856 ·

Re: Proposed Update to SPDX License Expression Language

A comment about the "+" operator. The standard SPDX Licenst list on the Appendix 1 of the 1.2 Specification, contains entries without the version qualification. Adaptive Public License

By Daniel Companeetz <dcompane@...> · #855 ·

Proposed Update to SPDX License Expression Language

Editor’s note: Big thanks to Mark Gisi for driving this important effort. *** In the wake of ahighly productive cross-functional meeting at the Linux Collaboration Summit, the SPDX Legal Team

By Philip Odence · #854 ·

[Bug 1194] New: MX4J license not in the SPDX 1.2 Standard License List

SPDX License List request added, with comments, to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration Please refer to

By Dennis Clark · #853 ·

Re: follow-up on today's SPDX legal call

Regarding the review of Fedora's "good licenses" for inclusion in the SPDX List (agenda Item #2), the shared document online has been updated with our discussions and decisions from today. See:

By zwhite@... · #852 ·

agenda for today's SPDX legal call

Call today at 1pm ET Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio 1) Update regarding discussions at LF Collaboration

By Madick, Paul <paul.madick@...> · #851 ·

Re: New License Request

New License Request, with Tom's comments, added to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration Regards, Dennis Clark nexB

By Dennis Clark · #850 ·

Re: New License Request

Hello Maciej and SPDX, Due primarily to the licensing information stated prior to the slightly modified BSD-4-Clause, I would recommend that this be reviewed by SPDX as a license distinct from the

By Tom Incorvia · #849 ·

New License Request

Dear Ladies and Gentleman, I'm not sure weather this should be considered BSD 4-Clause, so I've decided to submit request. Full Name of License: BSD 4-clause Caldera License License Identifier (aka

By Maciej Wereski <m.wereski@...> · #848 ·

meeting minutes and Collab Summit

The meeting minutes from this week have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-03-20 Most notably, the Collab Summit agenda has been updated with a description:

By J Lovejoy · #847 ·

2541 - 2560 of 3406

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms