Agenda for Thursday’s call: 1) SPDX 2.0 - last meeting (see link below to minutes) the legal team identified priorities that need to be completed for version 2.0 of the spec. Now we need to sort

Apologies for my absence from the call today. I had a board meeting. Hope it went well. * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas H. Vidal, Esq. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP 5900 Wilshire

Regarding the review of Fedora's "good licenses" for inclusion in the SPDX List (agenda Item #2),. See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmVnI0dGKEo1dENVVHFNeG5hQjAyYjQ3bm1VVUdjOFE#gid=1

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmVnI0dGKEo1dENVVHFNeG5hQjAyYjQ3bm1VVUdjOFE#gid=1

Call Thursday at 1pm ET Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio 1) Update license expression discussions

Thanks for your interest, Daniel, and thanks, Mark for your detailed response to Daniel’s questions. I’ve added few bits below for further clarification in regards to other (not GNU) licenses

Hi Daniel, The ‘+’ operator is used to represent the case we see so often: You may choose to use version <N> of license <L> or any later version of license <L>. The intent is to

A comment about the "+" operator. The standard SPDX Licenst list on the Appendix 1 of the 1.2 Specification, contains entries without the version qualification. Adaptive Public License

Editor’s note: Big thanks to Mark Gisi for driving this important effort. *** In the wake of ahighly productive cross-functional meeting at the Linux Collaboration Summit, the SPDX Legal Team

SPDX License List request added, with comments, to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration Please refer to

Regarding the review of Fedora's "good licenses" for inclusion in the SPDX List (agenda Item #2), the shared document online has been updated with our discussions and decisions from today. See:

Call today at 1pm ET Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio 1) Update regarding discussions at LF Collaboration

New License Request, with Tom's comments, added to http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration Regards, Dennis Clark nexB

Hello Maciej and SPDX, Due primarily to the licensing information stated prior to the slightly modified BSD-4-Clause, I would recommend that this be reviewed by SPDX as a license distinct from the

Dear Ladies and Gentleman, I'm not sure weather this should be considered BSD 4-Clause, so I've decided to submit request. Full Name of License: BSD 4-clause Caldera License License Identifier (aka

The meeting minutes from this week have been posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-03-20 Most notably, the Collab Summit agenda has been updated with a description:

Hi All, I'll be driving from San Jose to Napa Tuesday evening (flexible on departure time) and from Napa directly to SFO on Friday evening. If anyone wants to catch a ride in either direction, email

Hi All, We have our bi-weekly legal team call tomorrow (Thursday) at 10am PT / 1pm ET / 5pm GMT Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849 Enter this PIN: 336247 Alternative Numbers:

Oliver, As recorded at http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/License_List/Licenses_Under_Consideration#Licenses_Under_Consideration the SPDX legal working group has decided not to add the MSPPL to the

http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2014-03-06 Thanks to those on the call for the progress on the Fedora list! We have more to do, so let’s keep up the