Bear in mind that "LicenseInformation" is the Tag which is a short form of the full name, "License Information in File." This longer name was roundly supported by folks on the last Legal Team call,

Hi Kim, MIT is fine with me for the contributions from Source Auditor. I can update the license notices before the Beta starts. Note that the Jenna code is licensed under the BSD 3 clause. Gary

Hi Gary We were hoping that we might be able to license the tool under MIT, since that is what the LF uses. Is that a possibility? Kim On Thu 1/20/11 11:09 AM, "Gary O'Neall" <gary@...> wrote:

Just a follow-up on the OSS license for the SPDX tools . Attached is the Notice I included in the source. It contains a BSD 3-clause license for the source code provided by Source Auditor Inc. and

For the Beta program, there are two additional legal issues I want to raise for the legal team to discuss. What will be the OSS license for the SPDX tools we are providing? (ccing Gary since he

All: - Please note, proposed minutes from our last meeting are posted on the SPDX Wiki under the Legal Workstream section. Sorry for the delay. We will allow an additional week for approval of

Debian just moved DEP-5 from candidate to draft, so our window to harmonize with it starting to narrow. see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/01/msg00000.html The spec can be found

Hi Everyone Minutes on license meeting are now available on the wiki at the link below. We have a few remaining followups that are being chased down (per the minutes) and after that we will