On 11/10/21 11:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote: the full 15' sounds great, as I think all will be interested in the context as well thanks and look forward to it!

I'm ready to go if there's space in the agenda. My rehearsal of the talk clocks in at about 15 minutes, though I could trim this a bit because it's heavy on history to try to provide the full context

Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled call tomorrow, Thursday at 10 am mountain standard time. (the US has now pushed our clocks forward, so we should be back to our normal time zone gap

Hi Neal, I made an issue for a new license request - https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1355 In the future, please submit a new licenses to be added to the SPDX License List via the

I don't want to use LicenseRef identifiers. They're terrible hacks to deal with a process problem. SPDX agreed to import Fedora license identifiers some time ago, but since that stalled out, I want to

Hi Neal! If this can help we have tracked this in ScanCode for as long as I and git can remember: https://scancode-licensedb.aboutcode.org/fraunhofer-fdk-aac-codec.html We use this SPDX

Hey all, Since SPDX's effort to include all remaining approved Fedora licenses in SPDX has stalled out (again!)[1][2], can someone *please* add the FDK-AAC identifier to SPDX? It's blocking my

Dear all, My pull request regarding the BSD-1-Clause license is up and ready to be merged (https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/pull/1350). :) I've also been looking through the

Thanks Warner! On 10/25/21 3:35 PM, Warner Losh wrote: "standard header" is narrowly defined in the context of the SPDX License List

And I was just about to send out a reminder of our legal call in about an hour, so here's the reminder for everyone else! Thanks Vicky for letting us know and good luck with the

And thereby missing all of you lovely people. We’ve a big deadline this week so I need to use that hour for other things, unfortunately. --V -- VM (Vicky) Brasseur Director, Senior

Dear Warner, Armijn and Jillayne: So with a bit of digging in CVS (yeah!) ... on only one file (gmatch.c), it looks like the original commit had this caldera license header alright and that must have

Right. This doesn't answer my question about their heirloom /bin/sh. Was it from Caldera or was it from Sun? And why did they drop the intro text? Warner

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heirloom_Project

I've been grappling with this in the FreeBSD project. I'll share my perspective. There's two parts to that advice. The first is to include the standard boilerplate text to invoke the license ("the

I wonder why they are using the Caldera license? Did they harvest these files from the 7th Edition of Unix, or did Sun license these and Caldera made them put this license on things? The version 7

Hi all, We have some text at the bottom of this page https://spdx.dev/ids/ regarding the use of SPDX ids related to a recommendation about using and retaining standard headers

Hi all, I came across a "variant" of the Caldera license. Here is what we have on SPDX: https://spdx.org/licenses/Caldera.html But this project -

Thank you Jilayne and Richard for your kind answers. I am so used to look at file headers that I didn't even think of looking if there was a LICENSE file :-} Regards, Pierre

Hi Pierre, I am moving the general SPDX list to BCC and sending this via the SPDX legal list, as that is the right place for this question! Also not - I have approved your message and copied you here