Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled call tomorrow, Thursday at 10 am mountain standard time. (the US has now pushed our clocks forward, so we should be back to our normal time zone gap

By J Lovejoy · #3026 ·

Re: Please add FDK-AAC license identifier to SPDX license list

Hi Neal, I made an issue for a new license request - https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1355 In the future, please submit a new licenses to be added to the SPDX License List via the

By J Lovejoy · #3025 ·

Re: Please add FDK-AAC license identifier to SPDX license list

I don't want to use LicenseRef identifiers. They're terrible hacks to deal with a process problem. SPDX agreed to import Fedora license identifiers some time ago, but since that stalled out, I want to

By Neal Gompa · #3024 ·

Re: Please add FDK-AAC license identifier to SPDX license list

Hi Neal! If this can help we have tracked this in ScanCode for as long as I and git can remember: https://scancode-licensedb.aboutcode.org/fraunhofer-fdk-aac-codec.html We use this SPDX

By Philippe Ombredanne · #3023 ·

Please add FDK-AAC license identifier to SPDX license list

Hey all, Since SPDX's effort to include all remaining approved Fedora licenses in SPDX has stalled out (again!)[1][2], can someone *please* add the FDK-AAC identifier to SPDX? It's blocking my

By Neal Gompa · #3022 ·

License List 3.15 release - cleared for takeoff!

Dear all, My pull request regarding the BSD-1-Clause license is up and ready to be merged (https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/pull/1350). :) I've also been looking through the

By Sebastian Crane · #3021 ·

Re: remove recommendation re: standard license headers

Thanks Warner! On 10/25/21 3:35 PM, Warner Losh wrote: "standard header" is narrowly defined in the context of the SPDX License List

By J Lovejoy · #3020 ·

Re: Missing today's call

And I was just about to send out a reminder of our legal call in about an hour, so here's the reminder for everyone else! Thanks Vicky for letting us know and good luck with the

By J Lovejoy · #3019 ·

Missing today's call

And thereby missing all of you lovely people. We’ve a big deadline this week so I need to use that hour for other things, unfortunately. --V -- VM (Vicky) Brasseur Director, Senior

By VM (Vicky) Brasseur · #3018 ·

Re: Caldera license question

Dear Warner, Armijn and Jillayne: So with a bit of digging in CVS (yeah!) ... on only one file (gmatch.c), it looks like the original commit had this caldera license header alright and that must have

By Philippe Ombredanne · #3017 ·

Re: Caldera license question

Right. This doesn't answer my question about their heirloom /bin/sh. Was it from Caldera or was it from Sun? And why did they drop the intro text? Warner

By Warner Losh · #3016 ·

Re: Caldera license question

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heirloom_Project

By Armijn Hemel - Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions · #3015 ·

Re: remove recommendation re: standard license headers

I've been grappling with this in the FreeBSD project. I'll share my perspective. There's two parts to that advice. The first is to include the standard boilerplate text to invoke the license ("the

By Warner Losh · #3014 ·

Re: Caldera license question

I wonder why they are using the Caldera license? Did they harvest these files from the 7th Edition of Unix, or did Sun license these and Caldera made them put this license on things? The version 7

By Warner Losh · #3013 ·

remove recommendation re: standard license headers

Hi all, We have some text at the bottom of this page https://spdx.dev/ids/ regarding the use of SPDX ids related to a recommendation about using and retaining standard headers

By J Lovejoy · #3012 ·

Caldera license question

Hi all, I came across a "variant" of the Caldera license. Here is what we have on SPDX: https://spdx.org/licenses/Caldera.html But this project -

By J Lovejoy · #3011 ·

Re: [spdx] Message Approval Needed - tardyp@gmail.com posted to spdx@lists.spdx.org

Thank you Jilayne and Richard for your kind answers. I am so used to look at file headers that I didn't even think of looking if there was a LICENSE file :-} Regards, Pierre

By Pierre Tardy · #3010 ·

Re: [spdx] Message Approval Needed - tardyp@gmail.com posted to spdx@lists.spdx.org

Hi Pierre, I am moving the general SPDX list to BCC and sending this via the SPDX legal list, as that is the right place for this question! Also not - I have approved your message and copied you here

By J Lovejoy · #3009 ·

Re: call today

I'll give an update on FreeBSD's use of SPDX next time. Work has been unexpectedly busy so I've not had time to prepare. Warner

By Warner Losh · #3008 ·

call today

Hi all, We have our regularly scheduled call today in a bit over an hour from now. We’ll get back to reviewing issues and prepping for the next release - as well as any updates on other on-going

By J Lovejoy · #3007 ·

381 - 400 of 3406

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms