You have been invited to the following event. SPDX joint legal / tech team call When Thu Sep 24, 2020 12pm – 1pm Eastern Time - New

Hello legal and tech teams, This Thursday, September 24, will be a joint legal / tech team call. The call will be focused on continuing the discussions of the new "licensing" profile for SPDX 3.0. If

Greetings SPDX Tech and SPDX legal teams, A new URL for the SPDX online tools is now be available at https://tools.spdx.org. Please change any bookmarks or links from

Hello all, The next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be today, Thursday, Sept. 10, at 9AM PDT / noon EDT. Today's meeting will focus on reviewing and addressing questions from folks

Hello all, With apologies for the late reminder, the next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be today, Thursday, Aug. 27, at 9AM PDT / noon EDT. We'll start the meeting today with a

Hi all, Tomorrow’s regularly scheduled legal team call will be a joint call with the tech team to continue the conversation about the licensing fields and consolidation of such for the 3.0 spec. By

Greetings SPDX tech and legal team – I just posted minutes from our call at https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/Minutes/2020-08-11 A lot of good discussion, and I probably didn’t capture

My comments are in-line. Look for MDB: MDB My opinion is that the isMatch operator should be true/false only. I would also favor the addition of another operator with the name isValid for ensuring

Hi everyone, After discussing with mentors: Steve and Gary; we thought it wise to seek everyone's opinion on two topics: 1. Change back the isMatch field to Boolean(true/false) In the previous email

You have been invited to the following event. SPDX joint legal/tech team meeting When Tue Aug 11, 2020 1pm – 2pm Eastern Time - New York Where https://zoom.us/j/663426859

Hello all, The version 3.10 release of the license list is now tagged and live at https://spdx.org/licenses. This release included (as you’ll see below) a number of different variants on existing

< bcc general list as FYI for anyone who wants to follow the discussion, but moving to legal list> Quick search shows: - both version were on the list when we moved to the XML format in 2016 - email

Hello all, The next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be tomorrow, Thursday, July 30, at 9AM PDT / noon EDT. Tomorrow will be the last call before the 3.10 release, occurring Friday or

~ Gary O'Neall [2020-07-28 02:41 +0200]: Thank you! I've opened a Pull Request, but it only touches Annex E. I wondered whether we also have to clarify other snippet specifics

Hey folks, Gary has a CommunityBridge funding drive for the online SPDX tool. To support SPDX, an online tool has been developed which provides an easy all-in-one website to upload and parse SPDX

Hi Max, [G.O.] I personally would like to include this in the SPDX spec - we just need a volunteer to create an issue or (better yet) a pull request to update the Annex E Using SPDX license list

Hi all, At REUSE, we found some time to wrap our brains around this issue again. ~ Gary O'Neall [2020-06-05 19:58 +0200]: Thanks for the suggestions. I think what we need is a consensus on 1. how to

Hi everyone, This is a follow-up email on my previous email titled: Update on project: Validate license cross references Your contributions are welcome. Thanks, Smith

Hello all, The next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be this coming Thursday, July 16, at 9AM PDT / noon EDT. For the agenda we will focus on the (many!) open issues for 3.10:

Hi everyone, After discussing with mentors: Steve and Gary; we thought it wise to seek everyone's opinion on two topics: 1. Change back the isMatch field to Boolean(true/false) In the previous email