Luis, `LicenseRef-*` is technically part of the license expression syntax, too. But it mostly comes up in the context of (private, shared) SPDX XML files. I'm not aware of any package managers that

👋🏼 hope everyone is doing as well as they can under the circumstances. Is there any documentation for, or examples of, correct usage of License Ref? I've been looking this morning and can't

This would be a good time to note that folks who care about their software freedom cannot effectively participate in SPDX, and not only because the conferencing solution is proprietary software

Quoting Jeremiah C. Foster (2020-04-15 18:57:24) For the pragmatic angle of "does it work reliably" I agree that Jitsi is a viable option. Any conferencing service _can_ become unreliable when

"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...> writes: Yeah, FSF is running an instance that is being used to successfully teach classes at MIT right now. We'll post more about it soon,

The good folks at FSFE maintain a wiki page with Free Software alternatives: https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/FreeSoftware4RemoteWorking I should point out that in the SPDX calls we don't actually

I have not the technical expertise to judge the security level of the following solution that works with Zoom on Linux: https://www.linux.com/news/how-to-install-and-use-firejail-on-linux/ ---- For

Wow that's a blast from the early part of this millenium. Since Linux now runs over 80% of the world's computing resources, I thought we'd got over stigmatizing people who actually run it on their

I've used the Linux Zoom client nearly every day for a few weeks now, and less often for several months before that. It's been seamless for all the core talk-and-watch functionality. It does lag a

wrote: So no app for Linux then? As you can appreciate, a lot of us have now been evaluating a whole range of video conference technologies and one of the empirical rules I've been seeing is that

Hi Mark, Thanks for the generous offer. :-) We're not paying for zoom, however I'm definitely up for doing an experiment during our spdx-tech meeting tomorrow, and if it works for the regular

Hi Kate and other SPDX folk, We have been using Zoom to provide teleconference for SPDX meetings. In light of recent events, Zoom has gotten very popular, and also been failing many security audits,

Hi all, We’ve been doing quarterly releases for new SPDX License List versions on a calendar quarterly basis. We adopted this some time ago (before using Github) to provide some expectation and

Hello all, the next regularly-scheduled SPDX legal team meeting will be today, Thursday, Apr. 9 at 9AM PDT / noon EDT. The primary agenda item will be to discuss license requests currently tagged for

Hello Marnix, thank you for your email. You can submit this as a license for consideration in the SPDX license list repo, at https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues, for the community to

Hello dear SPDX moderators, I have created an open-source license that I published through my organisation (0810 Software) and I would like it to get indexed on your list. The license is

Hello, The SPDX legal team list is used for the development of the SPDX License List at https://spdx.org/licenses. However, this list is not used for providing legal advice about the interpretation of

Hi, can anyone explain the MIT License point that says to include the license of used code, but can it be included inside the file but not directly with copied code?

Hello spdx-legal list, This is a friendly reminder that the next release of the License List (version 3.9) is targeted for the end of April. I'd encourage folks to review the list of open issues,

Hi Andrew, Great! FYI - this email got moderated because you are not on the mailing list with this address. I have unmoderated you, but would be best if you could join the mailing list or use the