Agree. And also agree with Richard’s comment about avoiding legal interpretations. When you say that the license is “X AND Y” you are saying both licenses apply. Which is the fact for this file.

Hi Richard, I suspect the others will comment as well, but I would hope to see "SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0 AND Apache-2.0" as a summary. The second approach may become ambiguous to

Suppose you're dealing with the following source file legal notice (example taken from https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/permissive-code-into-mpl/, itself adapted from the examples discussed by

Hi all, Due to some unforeseen circumstances, both Steve and I are not available tomorrow. Given this would be our last meeting for 2019 (unless people wanted to meet on Dec

We should have a “note” on the BSD-3-Clause license. -- zvr

Hello, Thank you Wayne and Philippe for giving an answer that quicklyJ. I agree with the statement. Maybe it (former suggestion by Wayne) would be mentioned in the "license and exceptions

Hi Aurelien: <aurelien.carlier@...> wrote: As far as I can remember, since this is the same as the BSD-3-Clause license text (using the matching guidelines), it was never added as its own

We've discussed this previously (at my suggestion on behalf of the Eclipse Foundation). My recollection is that it was decided that SPDX would not add EDL-1.0 or any other licenses based on the

Hello, I would like to request addition of the Eclipse Distribution License in the SPDX license list. The EDL-1.0 is a variation of the New BSD License (fixing . Here is what I would suggest:

Hi Van, thanks for submitting this. I've copied it over to an issue in the SPDX license-list-XML repo, so that comments and input can be aggregated there -- see

Hello, I have received a preliminary positive report from OSI’s license committee on the Cryptographic Autonomy License v.1.0, or “CAL”. The CAL also includes a built-in “Combined Works

Minutes from today’s joint legal / technical has been posted to joint tech/legal call here: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/Minutes/2019-12-03 Gary

You have been invited to the following event. SPDX joint legal/tech team meeting When Tue Dec 3, 2019 1pm – 2pm Eastern Time - New York Where https://zoom.us/j/663426859

This week's SPDX legal team meeting will be cancelled due to the US holiday on Thursday. You should receive a calendar cancellation sent to this list shortly. We will likely be holding a joint legal /

This week's legal team meeting is beginning momentarily, apologies for the very late notice... UberConference: https://www.uberconference.com/room/SPDXTeam Optional dial in number: 415-881-1586 --

Hello all, The next Legal Team meeting will be today, Thursday, Oct. 31 at 9AM PT / 12PM ET. The agenda will include: 1) update from the joint legal/tech meeting last week 2) discussing a couple of

Hi, The Arch Linux community recently started a discussion around adopting SPDX license identifiers to simplify/improve their license handling:

I have added a new section at the bottom of this document that maps the fields to profiles, I've incorporated nearly all of the original proposal content into that

My feedback (and feel free to pass this onto their list) would be to ensure they adopt SPDX Expressions (https://spdx.org/spdx-specification-21-web-version#h.jxpfx0ykyb60) rather than accepting a

Hello all, The version 3.7 release of the license list is now tagged and live at https://spdx.org/licenses. Along with documentation updates and markup tweaks, 6 new licenses and exceptions were added