|
Re: New License/Exception Request: Link To My SoundCloud Public License
Hi, Bill,
I am not a lawyer, but this license has two drawbacks:
1) It’s pure existence aids license proliferation, which is a bad thing by itself.
2) Gluing the Soundcloud link to the
Hi, Bill,
I am not a lawyer, but this license has two drawbacks:
1) It’s pure existence aids license proliferation, which is a bad thing by itself.
2) Gluing the Soundcloud link to the
|
By
Markus Schaber <m.schaber@...>
·
#2528
·
|
|
Re: Updated project ideas - new login workflow
Die 18. 01. 19 et hora 18:30 Gary O'Neall scripsit:
I can see no issues (at least after only my first coffee) and it
looks really cool to me :)
cheers,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849
Die 18. 01. 19 et hora 18:30 Gary O'Neall scripsit:
I can see no issues (at least after only my first coffee) and it
looks really cool to me :)
cheers,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849
|
By
Matija Šuklje
·
#2527
·
|
|
Re: New License/Exception Request:Convertible Free Software License v1.1
Yes exactly, that is correct
Best Regards,
Elmar
Yes exactly, that is correct
Best Regards,
Elmar
|
By
Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@...>
·
#2526
·
|
|
New License/Exception Request: Link To My SoundCloud Public License
Full Name: Link To My SoundCloud Public License
Short Identifier: LTMSCPL
URL: https://github.com/joelotter/ltmscpl
This license is NOT OSI-approved and it has NOT been submitted for approval to
Full Name: Link To My SoundCloud Public License
Short Identifier: LTMSCPL
URL: https://github.com/joelotter/ltmscpl
This license is NOT OSI-approved and it has NOT been submitted for approval to
|
By
Bill Granfield <bill@...>
·
#2525
·
|
|
Re: New License/Exception Request:Convertible Free Software License v1.1
Dear J. Lovejoy,
Yes that should work since newer versions can always be auto-applied. Concerning version 1.3 it was not used in practice though I have forgotten to mark it as Draft until the OSI
Dear J. Lovejoy,
Yes that should work since newer versions can always be auto-applied. Concerning version 1.3 it was not used in practice though I have forgotten to mark it as Draft until the OSI
|
By
Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@...>
·
#2524
·
|
|
Re: Updated project ideas - new login workflow
that looks great!
Jilayne
that looks great!
Jilayne
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2523
·
|
|
Updated project ideas - new login workflow
Greeting legal and tech team,
Following up on last week’s legal call, Alan Tse and I discussed using some of the license diff features as part of the license submittal process. This resulted in
Greeting legal and tech team,
Following up on last week’s legal call, Alan Tse and I discussed using some of the license diff features as part of the license submittal process. This resulted in
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#2522
·
|
|
Re: New License/Exception Request:Convertible Free Software License v1.1
Thanks for the update, Elmar.
So, the “old” versions that you’ve created along the way for the OSI approval process are not being used in the wild, is that right? It seems like the versioning
Thanks for the update, Elmar.
So, the “old” versions that you’ve created along the way for the OSI approval process are not being used in the wild, is that right? It seems like the versioning
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2521
·
|
|
Re: New License/Exception Request: PNG Reference Library License 2
Hi Kai,
I think you are onto the right path in terms of adding the first license and updating our existing Libpng. As to the latter, that would have to be done via matching markup such that the
Hi Kai,
I think you are onto the right path in terms of adding the first license and updating our existing Libpng. As to the latter, that would have to be done via matching markup such that the
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2520
·
|
|
Re: New License/Exception Request: Python Imaging Library License
Hi Mark, Philippe,
I just had a closer look at this using Alan’s handy License Diff tool, which gave it a close match to MIT-CMU - the only difference between this license and MIT-CMU is:
- “and
Hi Mark, Philippe,
I just had a closer look at this using Alan’s handy License Diff tool, which gave it a close match to MIT-CMU - the only difference between this license and MIT-CMU is:
- “and
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2519
·
|
|
Re: New License/Exception Request:Convertible Free Software License v1.1
Hi Elmar,
It appears that you are still in the OSI review/approval process and as a result the license has evolved a bit. We are tracking it for submission to SPDX here -
Hi Elmar,
It appears that you are still in the OSI review/approval process and as a result the license has evolved a bit. We are tracking it for submission to SPDX here -
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2518
·
|
|
meeting minutes have been posted
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2019-01-10
Thanks for everyone for a good call and kick off for 2019. Please note action items at bottom and call for everyone to help with new license
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2019-01-10
Thanks for everyone for a good call and kick off for 2019. Please note action items at bottom and call for everyone to help with new license
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2517
·
|
|
Re: the freenode.net/#spdx channel seems to be dead, is there an official SPDX chat venue? <EOM>
Hi Marc:
We use https://gitter.im/spdx-org/Lobby (which is also accessible by
IRC) on the tech side.
Should be easy enough to have a legal channel there
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
Hi Marc:
We use https://gitter.im/spdx-org/Lobby (which is also accessible by
IRC) on the tech side.
Should be easy enough to have a legal channel there
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
|
By
Philippe Ombredanne
·
#2516
·
|
|
the freenode.net/#spdx channel seems to be dead, is there an official SPDX chat venue? <EOM>
By
Mark Atwood (Amazon.com)
·
#2515
·
|
|
Re: FSF Licensing and Compliance Lab: 2018 and the future
to note, Donald at FSF has already fixed the identifiers - you can see the blog post online here: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-licensing-compliance-lab-2018-and-the-future
:)
to note, Donald at FSF has already fixed the identifiers - you can see the blog post online here: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-licensing-compliance-lab-2018-and-the-future
:)
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2514
·
|
|
welcome to 2019!
Hi all,
I hope everyone had some nice time off and enjoyed the holidays.
You should have all gotten a recurring invite from Steve Winslow for the 2019 bi-weekly legal calls at 9am Pacific time.
Our
Hi all,
I hope everyone had some nice time off and enjoyed the holidays.
You should have all gotten a recurring invite from Steve Winslow for the 2019 bi-weekly legal calls at 9am Pacific time.
Our
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2513
·
|
|
Invitation: SPDX Legal Team call @ Every 2 weeks from 12pm to 1pm on Thursday from Thu Jan 10 to Thu Dec 26 (EST) (spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org)
more details »
SPDX Legal Team call
When
Every 2 weeks from 12pm to 1pm on Thursday from Thu Jan 10 to Thu Dec 26 Eastern Time - New York
Where
https://www.uberconference.com/SPDXTeam
more details »
SPDX Legal Team call
When
Every 2 weeks from 12pm to 1pm on Thursday from Thu Jan 10 to Thu Dec 26 Eastern Time - New York
Where
https://www.uberconference.com/SPDXTeam
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
#2512
·
|
|
Re: FSF Licensing and Compliance Lab: 2018 and the future
Very heartening!
From: "spdx-legal@..." <Spdx-legal@...> on behalf of Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@...>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2019 at 5:02 PM
To: "spdx-legal@..." <spdx-legal@...>
Subject: Re:
Very heartening!
From: "spdx-legal@..." <Spdx-legal@...> on behalf of Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@...>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2019 at 5:02 PM
To: "spdx-legal@..." <spdx-legal@...>
Subject: Re:
|
By
Phil Odence <phil.odence@...>
·
#2511
·
|
|
Re: FSF Licensing and Compliance Lab: 2018 and the future
That's great to see!
---
Mike Dolan
VP of Strategic Programs
The Linux Foundation
Office: +1.330.460.3250 Cell: +1.440.552.5322 Skype: michaelkdolan
mdolan@...
---
That's great to see!
---
Mike Dolan
VP of Strategic Programs
The Linux Foundation
Office: +1.330.460.3250 Cell: +1.440.552.5322 Skype: michaelkdolan
mdolan@...
---
|
By
Michael Dolan
·
#2510
·
|
|
Re: FSF Licensing and Compliance Lab: 2018 and the future
and yes, I am aware that they listed the SPDX short identifiers incorrectly and have reached out to the FSF asking for a correction. Still good mention in spirit, though!
Jilayne
and yes, I am aware that they listed the SPDX short identifiers incorrectly and have reached out to the FSF asking for a correction. Still good mention in spirit, though!
Jilayne
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#2509
·
|