If this can help, we have tracked in ScanCode all the 15 known text variations to

Hi all, I know I just wrote in the minutes that this task was on Richard F, but I was too curious not to have a cursory look myself! Attached is a compare of the project to corporate variant; and of

Hi all, Thanks for a productive call today. I’ve posted a summary of the discussion in the meeting minutes here: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2018-11-29 Please note: there was

just realized this only went to Richard. See corrected meeting time/zones below! Begin forwarded message: From: J Lovejoy <opensource@...> Subject: Re: meeting tomorrow/Thursday Date: November 28,

Should that be 12 noon Eastern time? (or 8am Pacific?)

Hi all, We’ll be back on our regularly scheduled call tomorrow/Thursday at 9am Pacific time / 11am Eastern time / 5pm Central European time. Web conference:

Hi all, Just a reminder that we will not have our regularly scheduled call this week, Nov 15th. Have a good week and/or holiday (if you are in the US) and we’ll resume our normally scheduled

I also updated the landing page on the wiki re: “where we work” - see https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team (there was no mention of Github repo before)

Hi all, In light of our discussion today about updates to the CONTRIBUTING file and the process for submitting a new license, I have made proposed changes to the CONTRIBUTING file in a PR here:

see: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2018-11-01 Please note: we will NOT have a meeting on Nov 15th!! We will reconvene on Nov 29th. Thanks, Jilayne

Different Brad here (for those just joining the SPDX discussion). I'm also in favor of considering open source hardware licenses, and look forward to the discussion about guidelines. Bradley, I'm also

Thanks, Andrew. I for one had planned to submit Solderpad and TAPR licenses if things move forward with supporting OSHW licenses. -J -- J. Simmons, PhD President Mach 30: Foundation for Space

Thanks J I intend to be on the call, so as one of the drafters of the licence, I’d be happy to discuss any questions people may have and also present the roadmap for the release of CERN OHL 2.0. I

Thanks for getting the OSHW licensing question on the agenda. Unfortunately, I am not available for the meeting tomorrow, but I have submitted the CERN OHL v1.2 as an example request (hopefully I did

Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception. CERN Open Hardware License v1.2 Provide a proposed Short Identifier. CERN-OHL-1.2 Provide a functioning url reference to the license or

oops, also meant to add: discussion as to adding open hardware and open data to our license inclusion guidelines more explicitly - see: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/719 Yes, I

Hi all, We have our call tomorrow at 10am Mountain Time - REMINDER!! I believe Europe has already ended daylight savings/put their clocks back, while here in the US we do that this coming weekend.

That is a really good point, Matija. Qiwihui - can you respond? Are you the author of this license? thanks, Jilayne

Hi Bradley, Are you referring to the remaining issue, as discussed here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/618 ? We did change the full names, as I think you raised (e.g., unproved and

J Lovejoy wrote: While I'd love to see all the CC licenses included, they aren't. :) (Not trying to open that discussion again -- just wanted to correct the typo Jilayne made there.) -- Bradley M.