Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: meeting tomorrow/Thursday

Should that be 12 noon Eastern time? (or 8am Pacific?)

By Richard Fontana · #2446 ·

meeting tomorrow/Thursday

Hi all, We’ll be back on our regularly scheduled call tomorrow/Thursday at 9am Pacific time / 11am Eastern time / 5pm Central European time. Web conference:

By J Lovejoy · #2445 ·

reminder: no meeting this week

Hi all, Just a reminder that we will not have our regularly scheduled call this week, Nov 15th. Have a good week and/or holiday (if you are in the US) and we’ll resume our normally scheduled

By J Lovejoy · #2444 ·

Re: proposed changes to CONTRIBUTING.md

I also updated the landing page on the wiki re: “where we work” - see https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team (there was no mention of Github repo before)

By J Lovejoy · #2443 ·

proposed changes to CONTRIBUTING.md

Hi all, In light of our discussion today about updates to the CONTRIBUTING file and the process for submitting a new license, I have made proposed changes to the CONTRIBUTING file in a PR here:

By J Lovejoy · #2442 ·

meeting minutes posted

see: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2018-11-01 Please note: we will NOT have a meeting on Nov 15th!! We will reconvene on Nov 29th. Thanks, Jilayne

By J Lovejoy · #2441 ·

Re: Introducing myself

Different Brad here (for those just joining the SPDX discussion). I'm also in favor of considering open source hardware licenses, and look forward to the discussion about guidelines. Bradley, I'm also

By Brad Edmondson · #2440 ·

Re: meeting tomorrow and other updates

Thanks, Andrew. I for one had planned to submit Solderpad and TAPR licenses if things move forward with supporting OSHW licenses. -J -- J. Simmons, PhD President Mach 30: Foundation for Space

By J. Simmons · #2439 ·

Re: meeting tomorrow and other updates

Thanks J I intend to be on the call, so as one of the drafters of the licence, I’d be happy to discuss any questions people may have and also present the roadmap for the release of CERN OHL 2.0. I

By Andrew Katz · #2438 ·

Re: meeting tomorrow and other updates

Thanks for getting the OSHW licensing question on the agenda. Unfortunately, I am not available for the meeting tomorrow, but I have submitted the CERN OHL v1.2 as an example request (hopefully I did

By J. Simmons · #2437 ·

New License Request: CERN Open Hardware License v1.2

Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception. CERN Open Hardware License v1.2 Provide a proposed Short Identifier. CERN-OHL-1.2 Provide a functioning url reference to the license or

By J. Simmons · #2436 ·

Re: meeting tomorrow and other updates

oops, also meant to add: discussion as to adding open hardware and open data to our license inclusion guidelines more explicitly - see: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/719 Yes, I

By J Lovejoy · #2435 ·

meeting tomorrow and other updates

Hi all, We have our call tomorrow at 10am Mountain Time - REMINDER!! I believe Europe has already ended daylight savings/put their clocks back, while here in the US we do that this coming weekend.

By J Lovejoy · #2434 ·

Re: New License/Exception Request: The Star And Thank Author License

That is a really good point, Matija. Qiwihui - can you respond? Are you the author of this license? thanks, Jilayne

By J Lovejoy · #2433 ·

Re: Introducing myself

Hi Bradley, Are you referring to the remaining issue, as discussed here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/618 ? We did change the full names, as I think you raised (e.g., unproved and

By J Lovejoy · #2432 ·

Re: Introducing myself

J Lovejoy wrote: While I'd love to see all the CC licenses included, they aren't. :) (Not trying to open that discussion again -- just wanted to correct the typo Jilayne made there.) -- Bradley M.

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #2431 ·

Re: New License Request: +CAL Software License

Hi Sally, I don’t think we ever saw a response to the questions below, so I’m re-sending. Can you please provide an update? Thanks, Jilayne SPDX legal co-lead

By J Lovejoy · #2430 ·

Re: Introducing myself

I’ve just added an issue to consider adding the OHSW (as well as an open data) reference to our license inclusion guideline here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/719 We have a fair

By J Lovejoy · #2429 ·

Re: New License/Exception Request: The Star And Thank Author License

In any case, should we decide to adopt this license, I would suggest we use a different short ID, as it could cause confusion with the widely known SATA/Serial

By Matija Šuklje · #2428 ·

Re: New License/Exception Request: The Star And Thank Author License

…this brings up so many questions in me. Would I really not be allowed to use the software, if I don’t +1 it? What’s next – “leave a favourable five-star review as a condition for you to

By Matija Šuklje · #2427 ·

961 - 980 of 3406

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms