Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: Call today

Dear Jilayne, In July 2018 the FSF updated its free software licenses list and the EUPL-1.2 is now "officially" listed as

By Patrice-Emmanuel SCHMITZ · #2366 ·

Re: Proposal for alternative licenses

Hi, I don't see anything in the SPDX license expression syntax that permits "OTHER"; without the prefix "LicenseRef-" this would be taken to be a valid SPDX short identifier that exists on the

By Sam Ellis · #2365 ·

Re: Proposal for alternative licenses

Markus Schaber: ... In a SPDX license expression you could use "OTHER", e.g.: (AGPL-3.0-only OR OTHER). That's less specific, but it does provide *some* information, it and doesn't require that a

By David A. Wheeler · #2364 ·

Call today

Hi all, We'll have our usual meeting today but keep it somewhat short and focus on reviewing and providing feedback for the XML editor. If you haven't had a chance to check it out please do

By J Lovejoy · #2363 ·

Re: Proposal for a generic new exception for OpenSSL

Sure ... as a lawyer just tell me if the form of words achieves what I need and is optimal. Thanks, James

By James Bottomley · #2362 ·

Re: Proposal for alternative licenses

Hi, Sam, Thanks for your reply - I think this covers the use case. About the validity of license combinations: The safest way is to have a whitelist with allowed licenses, listing also the kind of

By Markus Schaber <m.schaber@...> · #2361 ·

Re: Proposal for alternative licenses

Hi Markus, Referring to Appendix IV: SPDX License Expressions in https://spdx.org/sites/cpstandard/files/pages/files/spdxversion2.1.pdf, then SPDX allows for custom licenses to be named in the

By Sam Ellis · #2360 ·

Proposal for alternative licenses

Hi, this idea was inspired by https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/4628#issuecomment-411503940 It is a common situation that some project allows for multiple alternative licenses, some of them are

By Markus Schaber <m.schaber@...> · #2359 ·

Re: Proposal for a generic new exception for OpenSSL

Hi James, if there is interest, I volunteer to help with this one. cheers, Matija -- gsm: +386 41 849 552 www: http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suklje@... sip: matija_suklje@...

By Matija Šuklje · #2358 ·

Proposal for a generic new exception for OpenSSL

Hi All, I need to add an OpenSSL exception to an existing GPL-2.0 project and was hoping you'd already have one ready to go. Unfortunately, the only exception you have is OpenVPN specific, which is

By James Bottomley · #2357 ·

Re: license XML editor available to try out

Hi all, I just gave the XML editor a test run – using the Sendmail license differences - adding alt tags - as a test run. This way, maybe we can use this PR, instead of deleting 😉 First

By J Lovejoy · #2356 ·

Re: Sendmail has Updated its license

I think the yellow changes the meaning of Source Code (i.e., “associated” is broader than “compilable and linkable”) and thus is a different license. Alan D. Tse

By Alan Tse · #2355 ·

Re: Sendmail has Updated its license

Hi all, I did a merge and compare and looks like most of the changes should be accommodated via markup (for different names) – see green highlighting in attached. There is one extra bit (in

By J Lovejoy · #2354 ·

Re: Change use of SPDX *-Identifier tags in REUSE.software and Linux kernel best practices?

Ok Matija. Will do. Kate

By Kate Stewart · #2353 ·

Re: Change use of SPDX *-Identifier tags in REUSE.software and Linux kernel best practices?

Your analysis is correct. We used Valid- to avoid confusion, and to make clear REUSE/Linux kernel use of it was an addition to SPDX, not SPDX in itself. The exception identifier was left as the

By Jonas Oberg <jonas@...> · #2352 ·

Namingissue with FSFAP

Dear spdx-legal team, regarding the "FSF All Permissive license" FSFAP: The license is called "GNU All-Permissive License" by the http://copyfree.org/standard/licenses and the

By newsgrep . <newsgrep@...> · #2351 ·

Re: New License/Exception Request:Convertible Free Software License v1.1

Please excuse me in sending another mail about C-FSL; I just wanted to include a list of software which uses C-FSL v1.1.: qcoan: https://www.elstel.org/coan xchroot, confinedrv, bundsteg,

By Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@...> · #2350 ·

New License/Exception Request:Convertible Free Software License v1.1

Full Name: Convertible Free Software License Version 1.1 Short Identifier: C-FSL v1.1 URL: https://www.elstel.org/license/C-FSL-v1.1.txt OSI approved: not yet why we need this license: While the BSD

By Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@...> · #2349 ·

license XML editor available to try out

SPDX Legal Team: Tushar has made some really good progress on the XML editor. The SPDX tools has been updated on the SPDX tools website: http://spdxtools.sourceauditor.com Please try out

By Gary O'Neall · #2348 ·

Re: Change use of SPDX *-Identifier tags in REUSE.software and Linux kernel best practices?

Dne četrtek, 02. avgust 2018 ob 15:25:51 CEST je Kate Stewart napisal(a): That’d be wonderful. Should the three of us discuss how specifically to tackle this off list, since it’s not exactly

By Matija Šuklje · #2347 ·

1041 - 1060 of 3406

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms