Greetings! In review of SPDX specification (spdx.org/), I’m not seeing a clear annotation for U.S. Public Domain. Could you please clarify if such a license currently exists and I have failed to

Philippe Ombredanne twisted the bytes to say: Philippe> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:07 PM, dmg <dmg@...> wrote: Philippe> How about ~ 6000+ pages on Google [1] and ~ 90.000+ files in Github

Philippe Ombredanne twisted the bytes to say: Philippe> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:07 PM, dmg <dmg@...> wrote: Philippe> How about ~ 6000+ pages on Google [1] and ~ 90.000+ files in Github

I just completed an update of the licenses web page removing the offending ©. Let me know if you see any other issues. Thanks, Gary

Thanks for the explanation - So, changing it from © to (c) should work fine. I have the pages fixed, but I have a new issue trying to get onto the webserver to update the pages. The LF

Hi Sam, Yes - we deliberately produce both files. Originally, the site was created with HTML files without the .html extension. There were problems in rendering pages. After many attempts

Yes, it isJ The copyright symbol in the footer (in “© 2016 SPDX Workgroup”) raises the parse error, but it is because without the .html extension the browser thinks it gets XML instead of

I’m removing the general list from this thread, as we can sort out via legal team. Gary - is this related to the issue you and Philippe noticed the other day due to the new template?? Jilayne

I see an error reported at the top of this page: https://spdx.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0 The error is: error on line 213 at column 22: Entity 'copy' not defined I obtained this URL by

Thanks for catching this Alexios - you are right as to where the error is coming from… I’ll work with Gary to fix this. Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensource@...

This license is empty:http://spdx.org/licenses/NLOD-1.0.html I assume because the reference (at least in the Excel file) is to “NLOD-1..txt” instead of “NLOD-1.0.txt”. -- zvr

Are posted here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2016-04-07 Note: there is no SPDX legal call on April 14th - next call is the usual time on April 28th Thanks! Jilayne

Hi All, For those of you who remember discussing this license request and the Github conversation (they wanted to add the license to their choose-a-license list, but needed an SPDX identifier) -

“SPDX Legal call” has been updated.

Hi all, We have the SPDX legal call tomorrow at a special time due to conference interference: 10am Mtn Time, 12 ET, right after the general call. http://uberconference.com/SPDXTeam User PIN: 38633

Thank you Gary. That was quick! -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne +1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne@... DejaCode : What's in your code?! at http://www.dejacode.com nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com

Greetings all - The site has now been updated with conforming HTML. Gary

Thanks Philippe for pointing this out. Some of these errors were introduced when we updated the templates for a new website look. I always visually check the pages, but I'll add running them through

Excellent! Note that none of the generated files are valid HTML. See http://spdx.org/licenses/Glide for instance With the .html extension, the browsers deal with the quirks

Hi All, Version 2.4 of the SPDX License List is now available in the usual places. We added 9 new licenses for this release, including some international licenses and newly-approved by the