Hi, As we discussed in the last tech and legal call, we'll be having a joint meeting of the tech and legal teams today to discuss the license template syntax proposals. Meeting will be 1

Thank you Richard. The SPDX legal team will review the licenses for inclusion on the SPDX license list. Best, Paul Madick SPDX Legal Team co-lead

Greetings spdx-legal, The OSI recently approved three new licenses: Licence Libre du Québec – Permissive (LiLiQ-P) v1.1 Licence Libre du Québec – Réciprocité (LiLiQ-R) v1.1 Licence Libre du

Hi Harald, I’ve added this to our review for our next legal call on Jan 21. In the meantime, could you please provide us with a little more information about the license? It would be helpful to

Hi Rob, Thank you for submitting the request to add the Open Game License v1.0 ("OGL") to the SPDX License List. The SPDX Legal team has evaluated the license and we have concluded that we will _not_

Hi Jilayne, Thanks for the reminder. Not much progress on this, and in the meantime, I discovered another issue : it's the wrong clause that is referenced in theexception : it should be clause 2 and

Hi Camille, In the hopes of trying to tie up some loose ends from 2015, i thought I’d reach out to see if you were able to gain any insight as to this issue. I don’t know if the reference to

Minutes are here: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2016-01-07 Please note we will have a joint call with the Tech Team on Tuesday, Jan 19th during the usual tech team call time to discuss

HI Oliver, Brad comments below: Good reminder on what the law actually is. I always find it kind of funny that, while this is the legal reality, reproducing the copyright notice is deemed important

Thanks Oliver, You're right in the US too: no copyright notice is required here either (or in any of the countries that have signed on to the Berne Convention or TRIPS Agreement).

“SPDX Legal call” has been updated.

Hi Alexios, The markup to Plexus was added for the new release (v2.3) of the SPDX License List. You can see it (indicated by the red text on the HTML page) here: http://spdx.org/licenses/Plexus.html

Hi Jilayne, my comments are inline. Ciao Oliver Von: spdx-legal-bounces@... [mailto:spdx-legal-bounces@...]Im Auftrag von J Lovejoy Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 19:24 An:

Hi all, happy new year! Just wanted to make sure the first item below is not forgotten. I have seen the “same” text (with different names for attribution requirements) at: - Dom4j,

Please add the following license to the list. Identifier: "NLOD-1.0" Full name: "Norwegian Licence for Open Government Data (NLOD)" Text: http://data.norge.no/nlod/en/1.0 -- Harald Groven web

Hi All, You should have received a recurring invite for SPDX Legal calls in 2016 beginning tomorrow. If you did not, let me know off-list. Call in 2016 will be at the same bat-time and same

Hi Rob, I did not add any explanatory text as per your request. Like you said, we can cross that bridge if/when we get questions. By way of background or reminder for those who don’t know all

Hi All, Sam and I were discussing what to include (in the context of an SPDX document or generally for compliance with OSS used in a product) in terms of copyright notices and other “related”

Jilayne Lovejoy invited you to “SPDX Legal call”.

And available in the usual places: - “human-friendly” web pages: http://spdx.org/licenses/ - master files available here: http://git.spdx.org/?p=license-list.git;a=summary (use 2.3 tag) - info on