Hi All, You should have received a recurring invite for SPDX Legal calls in 2016 beginning tomorrow. If you did not, let me know off-list. Call in 2016 will be at the same bat-time and same

Hi Rob, I did not add any explanatory text as per your request. Like you said, we can cross that bridge if/when we get questions. By way of background or reminder for those who don’t know all

Hi All, Sam and I were discussing what to include (in the context of an SPDX document or generally for compliance with OSS used in a product) in terms of copyright notices and other “related”

Jilayne Lovejoy invited you to “SPDX Legal call”.

And available in the usual places: - “human-friendly” web pages: http://spdx.org/licenses/ - master files available here: http://git.spdx.org/?p=license-list.git;a=summary (use 2.3 tag) - info on

Hi, It's now been published on the OSI website: http://opensource.org/licenses/OPL-2.1 Richard

Thanks for this, Brad. I’ll make a note to add this to the general topic and proposal in the New Year! Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensource@...

It's not the wording. It's acknowledging their mistake's existence. purposes." And by adding that info, I get those questions, so I need to update my license.html page to preemptively explain about

I'm sorry, I've edited out numerous emotional asides this entire thread because I wanted to keep it professional. Apparently that meant I wasn't clear: I took it as a personal insult that somebody

Hi Rob, What I had in mind was: where it says “Note” on this page http://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html, to add something along the lines of capturing the following facts: "There is a license that

I don't care what OSI does. Please don't. Pretty please? Rob

Jilayne: I agree. In fact, I think listing both "0BSD" and "FPL-1.0.0" is a great solution, especially if the SPDX website includes notices with each similar to the text at

That sounds like a reasonable result, all things considered. I’ll add a note to the Notes field of Zero Clause BSD License to the same effect on the upcoming release of the SPDX License List.

I discussed the issue with Christian Bundy. He does not wish to change the name of the license. With respect to the Zero Clause BSD License I have therefore retained the existing approach on the OSI

Back home from traveling, I believe the ball is still in your court on this? Rob

I write to propose a new license exception. Fair warning: The exception is experimental, has not been applied, and will gladly adapt to feedback on overall concept as well as specific implementation.

We are not having a meeting in the 24th, Mark! ;) Sent from my phone, please excuse my brevity.

I will not be able to attend on 12/24 regardless of the time. best, - Mark

Hi All, Please check out the meeting minutes from today, in particular the bit at the end about no meeting on the 24th and the query as to whether we should stick with the same meeting day & time. We

Hi everyone, I'm mostly a lurker on these SPDX calls so far, but I'm very interested in the chance to move to (or at least make more use of) github in 2016, which was mentioned as a potential goal on