1. Messages
  2. Licensing/Legal Issues for Beta

Re: Licensing/Legal Issues for Beta

Gary O'Neall
 

Hi Kim,

MIT is fine with me for the contributions from Source Auditor. I can
update the license notices before the Beta starts. Note that the Jenna
code is licensed under the BSD 3 clause.

Gary

Hi Gary

We were hoping that we might be able to license the tool under MIT, since
that is what the LF uses. Is that a possibility?

Kim


On Thu 1/20/11 11:09 AM, "Gary O'Neall" <gary@...> wrote:

notice from Jenna ­ an open source component used by the pretty
printer.

Once I add the worksheet functionality, I will be adding another
component ­
Apache POI ­ which is licensed under the Apache 2.0 License.

Let me know if you would like any modifications to the licensing or
notices.
Join {Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org to automatically receive all group messages.