licenses to review for submission


J Lovejoy
 

Hi all,

In light of our discussion on our last call about how to make it easier and faster to get licenses reviewed (and adhere to our 3 “votes” from spdx-legal members for a license to be included), I’m sending a list of license submission issues that have at least one person reviewed below - please have a look and add your thoughts!

https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1706
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551


Note - not all of these used the license submission template. Relatedly, I used the new version of that on a couple and although the check boxes are an improvement, I still find it a bit clunky and slow. I am not sure if this is a biased view b/c I have so much historical knowledge, but I do think some of the factors are sort of “n/a” in some cases and you know that from the initial submission. That being said, I’m not sure I have any good ideas as to how to make it shorter or faster… yet….

Thanks!
Jilayne

Join Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org to automatically receive all group messages.