Re: Request for adding Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0
Alexios Zavras
We should have a “note” on the BSD-3-Clause license.
-- zvr
From: Spdx-legal@... <Spdx-legal@...>
On Behalf Of CARLIER Aurelien
Sent: Wednesday, 11 December, 2019 08:34 To: spdx-legal@... Cc: Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@...>; Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...> Subject: Re: Request for adding Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0
Hello,
Thank you Wayne and Philippe for giving an answer that quickly J. I agree with the statement.
Maybe it (former suggestion by Wayne) would be mentioned in the "license and exceptions tracking page" not to be requested again (I've checked before sending the email, trying to make things the right way).
Regards, Aurélien
[@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@]
De : Wayne Beaton [mailto:wayne.beaton@...]
We've discussed this previously (at my suggestion on behalf of the Eclipse Foundation).
My recollection is that it was decided that SPDX would not add EDL-1.0 or any other licenses based on the BSD-3-Clause template because doing so would set a precedent drawing in literally hundreds of other licenses based on that template.
For Eclipse projects that use EDL-1.0, we just use BSD-3-Clause as the SPDX code.
Wayne
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:36 PM CARLIER Aurelien <aurelien.carlier@...> wrote:
-- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc. Intel Deutschland GmbH |
|