Re: 3.1 release
Mark D. Baushke <mdb@...>
Alexios makes a good point.
An alternative would be to use an ISO 8601 to express time. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 Version: 3.0 published on 2017-12-28 Version: 3.0 of 2017-12-28 I will also note that if you do no like the International Standard Organization's view of time, you could choose a very exposed commercial package methods of encoding time. For example, SAS. It allows you to express time in many formats. http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/lrdict/64316/HTML/default/viewer.htm#a003169814.htm B8601DA8. == Basic ISO 8601 yyyymmdd 20171228 E8601DA10. == Extended ISO 8601 yyyy-mm-dd 2017-12-28 DATE9. == ddMMMyyyy 28DEC2017 DATE11. == dd-MMM-yyyy 28-DEC-2017 However, SAS do not generally encode any date field in "dd month yyyy" format. -- Mark |
|