Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request
Philippe Ombredanne
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Robinson, Norman <RobinsonN@...> wrote:
[...]
Are there any other countries doing it?
Having a standard license reference to encourage its normalization
would be awesome.
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne@...
DejaCode : What's in your code?! at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
[...]
While it could be argued UPL or public domain or CC0 1.0I think that the US Government public domain dedication is rather unique.
(creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) (SPDX CC0-1.0) does that, I
believe citing the reasoning it is public domain, because it is a US
Government work, will be most important to agencies who are also trying to
communicate they deliberately and with intent placed it is the public
domain, versus someone making the claim they were working on the project,
had a copy, or assert it wasn’t work for hire, or covered by contract
agreement on a government contract.
Are there any other countries doing it?
Having a standard license reference to encourage its normalization
would be awesome.
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne@...
DejaCode : What's in your code?! at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com