On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Schuberth, Sebastian wrote:when debugging an issue in the spdx-tools verifier, I noticed the
I wrote:On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Gary O'Neall <gary@...> wrote:I not see any reason why a + would not be allowed in a reference, and
In the 2.0 spec, the + is a unary operator with a specific meaningThis + is a suffix and not a freestanding character, right?
So "GPL-2.0+" is valid but "GPL-2.0 +" would not be valid?
In this case there would be no issue to have a plus as part of a licenseref:
there is no possible ambiguity.
Then again we would be better off to get rid of the plus entirely!