Re: New License/Exception Request


J Lovejoy
 

HI Camille,

We discussed this on the legal call today and would like to add this exception but discovered a glitch. The exception text does not indicate a version of LGPL, but includes the language:

“. . . and distribute that executable file under terms of your choice, without any of the additional requirements listed in clause 6 of the GNU Library General Public License. By "a publicly distributed version of the Library", we mean either the unmodified Library as distributed by INRIA, or a modified version of the Library that is distributed under the conditions defined in clause 3 of the GNU Library General Public License.”

Note the references to clause 6 and clause 3, which directly align with LGPL-2.0 and LGPL-2.1. Sure enough, it is LGP-2.0 that is provided on http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/license.en.html and most of the projects (I did not look at all) in the OCaml Github account use the exception with either LGPL-2.0 or LGPL-2.1

However, at least two projects in the OCaml Github account use the same exception with LGPL-3.0, which sort of breaks the exception as it is then referring to a different clause 6 and 3 - see: https://github.com/ocaml/opam2web/blob/master/LICENSE and https://github.com/ocaml/opam/blob/master/LICENSE

We wondered if this was a mistake or if there were plans to update the exception. If the latter, then we would be inclined to add both versions of the exception, but this could then impact the naming convention (e.g., we’d want to use version numbers in the exception or some other way to indicate the difference.)

Are involved enough with the project to raise this? Otherwise, I’m happy to reach out to them directly. Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Jilayne

SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...

On Jun 30, 2015, at 2:39 AM, Camille Moulin <cmoulin@...> wrote:

Hi,

Please find below the elements for the addition of a new exception to the SPDX list.

Best regards,
Camille

- Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception :
"OCaml linking exception"

- Provide a proposed Short Identifier :
"OCaml-exception"

- Provide a functioning url reference to the license or exception text, either from the author or a community recognized source : http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/license.en.html

- Create and attach a text file with the license or exception text from the url provided in #3. Please proofread the text file to ensure that:
- Information has not been lost or modified.
- Formatting is clean and consistent with the license or exception URL.
Please see attached file.

- Indicate whether the license is OSI-approved [Yes/No] (see: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical). If yes, provide link to the OSI license and verify that it is the same text as supplied in #4. :
No

- Provide a short explanation regarding the need for this license or exception to be included on the SPDX License List, including identifying at least one program that uses this license. :

This exception is currently used in many OCaml packages, which is a blocker for them to use SPDX in their packaging guidelines (see https://github.com/ocaml/opam/pull/2224#issuecomment-116399045 )
<OCaml_linking_exception.txt>_______________________________________________
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal

Join Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org to automatically receive all group messages.