exceptions for v2.1
J Lovejoy
Hi All,
I’ve begun to add the exceptions to the SPDX License List in preparation for the v2.1 release at the end of the month. A few things to ponder here or discuss on the next call: Should exceptions have markup for omitable or replaceable text, as per the Matching Guidelines? If so, we’d need to update the Matching Guidelines, 2.3 and 2.4 to reference the exceptions, instead of just the license text. Thoughts? Please have a look at the exception tab marked for release for 2.1 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11AKxLBoN_VXM32OmDTk2hKeYExKzsnPjAVM7rLstQ8s/edit?pli=1#gid=0 and review for the following items: 1) names and short identifiers - this could use another look, before putting these on the list. 2) I’ve noted some exceptions specifically because they have text that could possibly use markup:
Cheers, |
|